Rob Paterson offers the example of the New Bedford whaling community as a successful community of practice.
The entire community was financially behind the trip. All contributed to ensuring that the investment was safe by offering the very best equipment from the boat to the rigging. All crew members were paid on a share basis – all had a vested interest in supporting all the others on the ship. It was considered bad form to sail with the same crew so experience was continually spread around the fleet. Every position was apprenticed so their was a hierarchy of experience behind every trade and position. All captains shared their logs at the end of every trip so the NB fleet collected the collective wisdom and experience of every trip.
New Bedford = New Brunswick? Couldn’t we use a similar model for LearnNB? I think that some of the keys to this community are shared risk, no return on investment until the voyage is over, and the sharing of ships’ logs. Sounds almost like the open source community.
I re-read Thomas Goetz’s article "Open Source is Everwhere" in last November’s Wired Magazine, to try to focus on the real reasons for favouring open source. I want to reassure myself that I’m not becoming dogmatic in my support of OS systems. This quote from the end of the article resonated with me:
Open source is often framed as an attack on the corporate world at large. But in fact, the open source approach can be a boon for companies. Licensing from a trusted collaborative project saves money and leaves the technology open to further development. By showing corporations that a closed, defensive approach to intellectual property can be less efficient than liberal licensing, Cambia and a few other open source efforts are leading the way to the mainstream.
In this light, where corporations are part of the model, open source suddenly becomes something less marginal and more ingenious. It forces industry to reckon with openness rather than hide behind intellectual property. In driving down the cost of software or encyclopedias or biotechnology, open source is unleashing billions in capital otherwise put to woefully inefficient ends. Just because it’s not about making money first doesn’t mean it won’t make money second (just ask the folks who bought their mansions with Red Hat shares).
Openness is pretty much like democracy; and I can’t see many reasons against it. The same for lower costs and increased efficiencies. I also like the idea that open source is still about making money, because we all have to feed our ourselves and our families. What I like best about open source is that the development process is a real meritocracy, much like being an entrepreneur. In small business, if you don’t deliver, you can’t make an honest living.
According to Dave Pollard, here is what the blogosphere wants.
Blog readers want to see more:
original research, surveys etc.
original, well-crafted fiction
great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
news not found anywhere else
category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
benchmarks, quantitative analysis
personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
live reports from events
insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
short educational pieces
relevant "aha" graphics
useful tools and checklists
pr?É¬©cis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content
Blog writers want to see more:
constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
‘thank you’ comments, and why readers liked their post
requests for future posts on specific subjects
foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
comments that engender lively discussion
guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs
I think that we all have our work cut out for us. Any comments?
The Confederation Centre of the Arts on Prince Edward Island has created an impressive online learning resource entitled Narratives of Nationhood. Available in French and English, this website offers a wide array of learning activities focused on the art at the centre. There are hundreds of lesson plans available for school teachers, and a wealth of digital art displays. A lot of time and effort has gone into this resource, and it is available in a Macromedia Flash as well as an HTML version. Nice to see that some people are still designing with accessibility in mind.
Thanks to Nathalie at the Justice Knowledge Network for telling me about this.
Hal Richman and Eilif Trondsen from SRI Business Consulting Intelligence are writing a series of three articles for ASTD’s Training and Development magazine (Sept-Nov 2004) that build on their recent report on Learning Outsourcing: Strategic Opportunity Perspective.
We are interested in stories, anecdotes from training staff in any organization that has undertaken training outsourcing.
If you have interesting stories that you would like to share, check out the post on Passion4Learning.
As a follow-up from a previous post on open source in government, it’s good to see the Ontario Department of Education has signed an agreement with Sun Microsystems to use Star Office. Star Office and its open source (free) version Open Office provide Microsoft compatible desktop applications for documents, spreadsheets, presentations and PDF export. Star Office retails for $(CA)79.95 but, according to the IT Business report:
Financial details of the arrangement were not disclosed, but Sun Canada’s director for education and research Lynne Zucker said that the fee was minimal.
I had suggested a similar solution to the Government of New Brunswick as well as the Department of Education, and received a nice e-mail for my suggestion. Perhaps Ontario’s example will lead to our province examining the use of open source software in government. It might even keep my taxes down. Via Seb.
Ensemble Collaboration launched this week and is getting some very good press. The local Atlantic Canadian press of course reported this, but so did the national Globe & Mail. From Canada East:
The degree of acceptance for the product surprised Mr. Watson. One potential customer said he would fly to Fredericton next week to visit with company representatives.
"Honestly, the most frequent question was, ‘How soon can I get it?’ Mr. Watson said. "The opportunities seem to be much greater than we anticipated and the market seems to want to get this sooner rather than later. And that was only the first day."
It’s good to see some excitement in the business again. Congratulations Ben!
Via Seb is this discussion (in French) about laptops in schools. The students at this northern New Brunswick school were asked on the Haut-Madawaska Learning Centre blog – what do you think of the Education Minister’s request for schools to participtae in a laptops in schools project and should we participate? The responses, which seem to be all from students, range from "computers will enrich our IT skills and increase communication in class" to "access to more computers would help us to access our existing class blogs" and "it would make research a lot easier" and "Wow, what a good idea".
Even the 2nd Grade class thinks that laptops in 7th and 8th Grade are a good idea. Of the estimated 100 comments, only one was slightly negative. So there it is. The students (learners) are resoundingly in favour of laptops in school.
I have always believed that the key to learning is motivation, having been influenced early on by Gagne’s events of instruction – where the first instructional event is "activating motivation". These students are already motivated!
The best coverage so far on ASTD 2004 is from e-Clippings. These posts include an overview of Harold Stolovitch’s session, quoting Harold on the definition of "technology":
Technology is the application of organized and scientific knowledge to solve practical problems.
This is the correct definition of technology when applied to Human Performance Technology [my field] – which is NOT about information technology, but solving problems in an applied way.
If you want to know what giveaways are popular on the exposition floor at ASTD 2004 then read the T&D Blog. Not much else though.