Going the Distance to Calgary

I’m in Calgary doing some client work where I also met with Camille Jensen, a fellow Informl Unworkshop participant and Editor of the Alberta Distance Education & Training Asssociation’s newsletter, The Distance. Camille gave me a quick tour of downtown Calgary, including these supposedly wind-reducing statues:

calgary.jpg

As free-agents in the same field, we discussed all kinds of topics, ranging from schooling to instructional design to what is the best descriptor for our chosen professions; all in the warm Alberta sun :-)
CamilleJensen.jpg

Camille has put together an excellent newsletter at ADETA (not just because I have an article in it) including a description of Connectivism by George Siemens. Camille’s overview of web 2.0 technologies for learning is perfect for anyone who needs a primer on this changing field. The other Informl Unworkshop participants who wrote articles for this edition include Dave Ferguson (Job Aids), Dave Lee (Pitfalls of web 2.0 apps) and Jay Cross (on the semantics of all this *2.0 stuff).

The newsletter (PDF) is available on the ADETA website.

Constellation W

Via Jon Husband, one of the creators, is a new website called Constellation W. This bilingual, interactive information site looks at three threads of development – Technology, Economy, Society – that are currently entering new eras. The site lets you follow deeper explanatory links to examine the data, understand the past thirty years, and see what to watch for today. One of the aims of the site is to provide, “A space for citizens to reflect on our collective future.”

The site includes many diagrams and pictures and allows you to add comments in certain areas. This got me to thinking about the wiki textbook project at Education Bridges, and the desire to create useful educational resources where others can add to a knowledge base and let it grow organically. Constellation W is not all that interactive but I don’t think that it would take a lot of additional programming to open it up. I also find that the layout and navigation of Constellation W is more appealing than your average wiki. I’d encourage anyone in the Education Bridges community to check this out (that’s you, Dave).

Anyway, it looks very interesting and I intend to explore it some more. Constellation W could be an excellent web exploration site for students as well.

Permalink Woes

As all bloggers know, permalinks are the permanent universal resource identifiers used as addresses for blog posts. One post, one permalink. The permalink doesn’t change so that people can link and refer to it over time and it can easily be found.

Well, I guess I’ve commited permalink sacrilege because I changed the settings of my permalinks from the default in WordPress to one with the name of the post attached to the domain name (e.g. jarche.com/permalink-woes/). Unfortunately that created a whole bunch of routing errors, on top of the redirects from previous Drupal (my last content management system) permalinks such as – jarche.com/node/123. I am now back to the default permalink style for WordPress (jarche.com/?p=123) and will not change it again.

I also discovered that all older links were renamed as well, so that what should be jarche.com/?p=123 was for a short period renamed jarche.com/OLD123 , and that style of naming no longer works.

My apologies to anyone who has unsuccessfully tried to follow an old permalink. My stats show that there are many of these each day. All that I can suggest is that you search, in the search box on the top right, for the title or some keyword. Sorry :-(

A Lesson in Receivership

Life is different from school in one significant way – in real life you get the test first and the lesson follows. I often say that we learn best from our mistakes, so I’ve definitely learned something this week.

One of my clients recently went into receivership. This is different from bankruptcy, as the Receiver informed me today, because as an unsecured creditor I’m not entitled to any compensation for my completed work. The only secured creditor is the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC), “a financial institution wholly owned by the government of Canada” (kind of makes me a minor shareholder). The bank gets 100% of what’s left, which equates to about one third of its investment, so the bank suffers a significant loss but the rest of us get nothing.

What have I learned from this?

  • It’s better to be a secured creditor than an unsecured one.
  • Receivership is different than bankruptcy.
  • As one of 30 other unsecured creditors, I see what kind of an impact receivership/bankruptcy has on the local business community.
  • Always, always negotiate some up-front payment, even if you have done work with the client before, so that you’re not out 100% in case of a disaster.
  • The project isn’t over until the cheque clears the bank.

For additional learning, here are some definitions from the Canadian Bankruptcy Dictionary [link removed by request of BankruptcyCanada.com – see below for text of request]:

Debenture:
Security instrument evidencing a debt due from one party to another, payable on demand or otherwise, which can be a fixed and/or floating charge on assets and which can grant the lender broad powers to recover the amount due upon default, including the appointment of a receiver or receiver-manager.

Receiver:
A person or corporation appointed by a person who holds a debenture or other security agreement, giving that person authority to take possession of and sell the asset(s) specified in the debenture. A Receiver cannot manage or operate a company for more than 14 days.

Receiving Order (Bankruptcy Order):
An Order handed down by the Court following the successful petition to have a person or company placed into bankruptcy. In an amendment dated December 15, 2004 this term was changed to Bankruptcy Order.

email received 2 Jan 2014:

Hi. My name is Gordon Sands. I am a principal of BankruptcyCanada.com.

We are contacting you to respectively request that you remove or mark as “NoFollow” the link(s) you have to BankruptcyCanada.com from http://jarche.com/  because the links are not in the same niche as our site.

Kindly advise us when you have either removed or marked the links “NoFollow” so we do not send you a follow-up email.

Regretfully we will be forced to submit, websites not complying with our request, to Google using their Link Disavow procedure. This may have an adverse effect on your site.

Yours truly,

Gordon Sands

Gordon@BankruptcyCanada.com

Update: More information on how the golden era of spam comments has ended, and what likely prompted the email “request” above.

A few good books

One of my first posts when I started this blog was a number of Book Reviews. Later that year, I listed some Books I would like to read, but I never got around to reading a single one of these. I did read several others, and wrote about this as Worthwhile Reading at the end of that year.

Bookshelf

Here is an updated list of books I’ve read and would recommend:

Seeing What’s Next by Christensen et al – if you haven’t read the innovator’s Dilemma or The Innovators Solution, you can jump right in to this book. It’s an excellent strategic perspective for start-up businesses.

The Art of the Start by Guy Kawasaki. This is the bible if you are starting any kind of new enterprise, for profit or not.

Nine Shift by William Draves & Julie Coates. A look at the parallels between the beginning of the last century and this one. A fascinating read on what could happen as we transition to the Internet Age.

Solving Tough Problems by Adam Kahane. Short but powerful book on working with complex issues.
The Undercover Economist by Tim Harford. Economics for average folks. A fun read with plenty of insights on “why the rich are rich, the poor are poor – and why you can never buy a decent used care”.

A Whole New Mind by Dan Pink. Definitely one to read if you haven’t picked this one up yet. Pink’s book shows the importance of creativity and empathy as critical skills for future success in life. It may have you reconsider your child’s higher education options.

I’m currently reading Ideas, based on the CBC radio program and have just ordered read The Wealth of Networks [The most comprehensive analysis on our change to a networked digital economy. This is not light reading, but is a required resource for anyone seriously considering the implications of the internet age on our economy, our governance and our society.]

Update 2007

The Upside of Down by Thomas Homer-Dixon. Much of the book is dedicated to an explanation of the five tectonic stresses that we face as a civilization – population; energy; environmental; climate and economic. The main message of the book is that in times of crisis and destruction come opportunities for regeneration. This requires a “prospective mind” that can anticipate crises and prepare for them. Homer-Dixon encourages building resilience into our communities and economies, so that we are not dependent on tightly coupled global supply chains.

Informal Learning by Jay Cross. Even though I read several of the manuscripts, the book is much better. It’s synthesized, flows and has great graphics. I am a huge proponent of the importance of informal learning for our society and Jay covers a lot of ground in his book. This is a book that you can use as an introduction to the subject or as a reference. Highly recommended.

Getting to Maybe by Westley, Zimmerman & Patton. This is a book about social innovation in complex environments (our world). It covers the stories of many social innovators and discusses the various parts of a common path that many take. This is a path with no map and no destination. Getting to maybe, or “if only …”, starts with the first step of realising that here and now is the best and only place to start. A chapter is dedicated to each identified step, but these are more like checkpoints than actual steps in a process. There are no answers in this book but I think that it may be an inspiration for many who are on the journey of social innovation and need to know that they are not alone.

How Computer Games Help Children Learn by David Williamson Shaffer. This is an excellent book for anyone interested in learning and education, but the title is a bit misleading. It’s more about the theory and practice of authentic learning experiences than specific computer games. Many of games mentioned in the book, like the debating game, are not computer-based, but could be computer enhanced. Shaffer’s book is really about epistemic games, or games that are fundamentally about learning to think in innovative ways.

A Business Plan for The Commons

As I mentioned, we are moving ahead with the idea of The Tantramar Commons, and the next step is to develop a business plan. Guy Kawasaki’s Zen of business plans, is a perspective that suits me well. I’ve used his short pitch format for business models before and find it’s a good way to focus, not just for investors, but for funders of non-profits.

My aim is to develop a plan for the longer term viability of The Commons. If we are economically sustainable, then we have a good chance for government investment in the necessary physical capital. This is a different perspective than that of a business start-up that has to show a return on investment on its capital. It’s more like the rationale to build interstate highways 80 years ago. We are creating some common ground for knowledge-based organisations that are not focused on short-term profits. One of our aims is to have a culturally, environmentally and economically viable community. Our Commons will be an investment in a garden plot, and members will decide what they plant and care for. The exciting aspect will be the opportunities for cross-pollination. Fiftyty independent organisations, all generating wealth in some way, stand a better chance of survival than one company employing 50 people. The commons is about productive living, not jobs.

Of course, we have to make money and pay the bills. However, The Queen Street Commons is evidence that a work commons can function. Our cultural commons needs to provide the kind of infrastructure that will support early-stage artists and crafts people and help them develop into viable enterprises. Perhaps some form of common teaching and learning space would do it. The environmental commons already has some potential renters but it may also need common space for shared activities. Access to free highspeed Internet seems to be a desirable common good for anyone who visits or stays at the commons, as our connectedness to the rest of the world is essential for our prosperity. Anyway, there are lots of ideas.

I’ve started to collect online resources and examples of commons and bookmark them. I’d appreciate any other information, especially experiences and similar initiatives. I know that there is a group in Halifax considering the creation of a commons as well. I’m sure that we’re not alone, as almost everyone I speak has realised the limitations of our current economic structures in supporting meaningful and productive work.

As knowledge expands

Christian Long’s post on the required use of handheld computing devices (PDA’s) for medical students is a good indicator of the changing nature of knowledge in all professions:

Sometimes schools get scared and annoyed, banning Google searches and iPods in the classrooms. Sometimes they go the opposite direction, believing that technology may actually make the world a better place one PDA at a time. Over at Brown University, Providence, RI, the second tact seems to be the case.

As an assistant professor at the University of Rhode Island College of Nursing notes :

“If we had students buy a book, by the time the book hits the bookstore, it’s outdated,” Lauzon Clabo said. “And with using PDAs, they can update their software weekly.”

Learners need up to date information and access to knowledgeable people in their own, as well as other, fields. Textbooks no longer meet that need. Unfortunately for specialists and texbook writers, the digital medium is making many of them redundant. The texbook is no longer the primary source of knowledge; instead it’s the messy, disorganised worldwide web. A similar debate of whether experts and school boards should pre-authorise the content of wiki textbooks went on for a while at Education Bridges.

First it’s the professional schools, soon it will be public schools who reject the textbook and the small circle of experts who write and publish them. I look forward to this democratisation of educational resources. The more the merrier.

The Search Epoch

Few people would argue that the Internet has changed the way we work and live, even though there are some who may not realize how much life has changed and how great the business implications. If you follow Nine Shift, you’ll know that they predict this epochal change to be complete around 2020, when 75% of our discretionary time is different from pre-2005.

Just as significant a change has happened on the Internet during the past five years. That is the advent of Search. Seth Godin highlights how serach has levelled the playing field, making industry leaders less important:

If there’s no search engine and you need a recipe or a pot, you visit cooking.com and they find you the best match on their site. And it goes beyond web companies. If there’s no search engine and you need to buy coffee, you go to Starbucks.com, right? Leaders in every field had no reason to invent for search… it’s not good for them.

In John Batelle’s book, The Search [a recommended read], he notes that:

Increasingly, search is our mechanism for how we understand ourselves, our world, and our place within it. It’s how we navigate the one infinite resource that drives human culture: knowledge.

Search has levelled the playing field but it has also increased our dependence on it. This makes the issue of who owns and controls the pipes & nodes on the Internet exceptionally important. If large telcos and ISP’s can provide faster speeds for preferred clients or influence search engines in any way, then our access to the knowledge that we need will suffer.

Now that everyone recognizes the power of search, this is becoming a battleground for control by multinational corporations. Keep an eye on this field and please get involved where you can, as this will affect how our children work, learn and create.

Some resources:

Michael Geist’s Internet Law Blog (Canadian)

The Cooperation Commons (a venue for discussions)

Oligopoly Watch (keeping watch on all those mergers & acquisitions)

Open Business (open source business models as an alternative to the above link)

Electronic Frontier Foundation (working to protect your digital rights)

Creative Commons (flexible copyright, so that you can use what you find when you search)

UK Debate over Relevance of Curriculum

The UK Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL) is proposing that there be no national curriculum for students under 16, instead opting for a locally negotiated course of studies based on competences rather than specific subjects.

“We need to give teachers the freedom to inspire youngsters so they want to learn, not just pass tests. We also need pupils to have the space to develop as rounded people, and that includes physically, emotionally, creatively, socially and ethically.”

So reports the Education Guardian, but also quotes opponents to this proposition:

But Alan Smithers, professor of education at the University of Buckingham, said yesterday of the ATL’s proposals: “This is disturbing nonsense. The point about testing is that we discovered quite shocking things about how few of our children could handle words and numbers properly at the age of 11. Without that testing we would have assumed that everything was ok.”

I can understand the opposition to this recommendation, in that students may “slip through the cracks”, but Smithers’ remarks are based on a supposition that teachers and the education system know what’s best for students. Here I strongly disagree. The current industrial educational model is inadequate from most perspectives:

  • Schools do not prepare students for jobs, because we don’t even know what jobs will exist in 5 to 10 years.
  • Many universities complain that students are ill-prepared for their first year.
  • About one third of Canadian school dropouts are A & B students, indicating that motivation is a key issue.

The needs of struggling students as well as gifted students are equally ignored by national curricula. Local control means that parents can get involved in discussions about what would work best. As it stands, teachers have no control over the curriculum, and are as helpless as parents and students.

Experts like Smithers do not know what is best for everyone and I question their authority as experts on every learner in their respective countries (see Dave’s post on experts). One cannot possibly set a national curriculum that addresses all the learning needs of every student. I’ve already mentioned how the death of curriculum could mean the rebirth of learning, and perhaps this move by the ATL will open up the debate on the constraints of curriculum.

Further resources on Public Education.

The Tantramar Commons

Over the past few years, I have been influenced by some thinkers and innovators who believe that business as usual won’t address our needs for life and work in the next century. The open source software movement, Natural Capitalism, Dave Pollard’s work on the Natural Enterprise, Robert Paterson’s Going Home essay and the creation of the Queen Street Commons have all influenced my thinking and now my actions. I’m glad to say that what was once was only an idea is finally getting closer to reality. That is the creation of a new model for a sustainable community – The Tantramar Commons

After two years of discussion and observation we now have an opportunity to fund the creation of a Commons. We know that any initiative of this sort must be financially sustainable but we also know that our community and world must be environmentally sustainable and that a dynamic culture is essential for growth as a community. Therefore, our Commons, a cooperative endeavour, will be founded on three interdependent pillars: an environmental commons, a cultural commons and a work commons.

The core of the environmental commons will be based on the Atlantic Wildlife Institute. AWI promotes learning and awareness about the direct links between environmental health and human wellness through its work in wildlife rescue, rehabilitation, and research. Having recently completed a learning centre in nearby Cookville, at AWI’s 120 acre facility, we are now looking at constructing a new facility in Sackville for our research and networking initiatives. Other environmental organisations have already expressed an interest in joining or participating.

WLC.jpg
Photo: AWI Learning Centre

The cultural commons will reinforce organisations such as local galleries and Mount Allison’s faculty of fine arts. It will provide a focal point for artists and artisans with space for demonstrations and education, integrating cultural expression into the fabric of the community. Several local artists have shown a willingness to support this commons.

The work commons will be based on the lessons learnt by the Queen Street Commons, and here is a quote from their website:

Two hundred and fifty years ago, at the dawn of business, everyone worked at home. People found it convenient to spend the day in the close company of others who shared their common interests. One of the first venues was Lloyds Coffee House. Friends aggregated into booths and then into partnerships with each other. Those who wanted to do business with these “syndicates” wandered around the floor. From this simple beginning arose the world’s most effective insurance business.

Today more and more of us also work from home. While the Internet offers us some community, we can feel isolated and we often find the costs of basic infrastructure expensive. In addition, we miss by our social isolation, the synchronicity of opportunity that arises from meeting regularly in person. Many of us also work in sectors, and on ideas, that are still in their infancy. We are therefore vulnerable to the no-sayers and to the mainstream. This type of work needs the protection of social space where we develop amongst ourselves the trust, the community and ultimately the power, to take these ideas into the light of day.

Why do we need a Commons?

We are witnessing a shift in how the world works, as we move out of the Industrial age into the Internet age. Today, the manufacturing sector, our major source of wealth for the last century, is shrinking, much as the agricultural sector shrank 80 years ago. At some point in the future, knowledge workers will outnumber manufacturing employees. However, knowledge workers are different from the salaried employees that we have become used to for the past 80 years.

According to the authors of Nine Shift, knowledge workers:

  • Are paid by their outcomesa and what they produce; not by the time they put in.
  • Knowledge Workers bring something unique to the organisation for which they work.
  • Their value is not in being like other workers, but in being different.
  • Knowledge workers have a marketable set of skills.

In the near future, knowledge worker incomes will be a major source of revenue for many municipalities. Most knowledge workers will be paid by organisations from outside of the area. This income will be a net input of revenue into the community, as opposed to money that just changes hands locally. However, these knowledge workers will have their choice of where to live, and cities and regions will start to compete for them. Therefore, we need to develop our community infrastructure so that it is attractive not just for work, but as a healthy environment that also provides cultural stimulation.

To foster inter-sectoral cooperation, we need some common and neutral ground where we can start to have conversations and develop real understanding. This will be necessary to overcome traditional power relationships, especially for those who feel under-represented in our current political and economic structures.

I think of the Commons as a garden where members can plant and grow what they want, in a fertile environment that also encourages cross-pollination. The Commons will become a diverse community eco-system that will be more sustainable than the traditional factory or business. If one organisation in the Commons fails, it will not bring down the entire structure. Compare that with a mill closing in a similar small town in New Brunswick.

What do we hope to accomplish?

  • The Tantramar Commons will be a focal point for the new Wildlife Emergency Response Network, which will bring in visitors, researchers and more like-minded organisations.
  • It will be a home for non-profit organisations where they can concentrate on their programs.
  • The Commons will be a welcome place for innovative start-up businesses.
  • It will be an intersection for dialogue between sectors, such as between local farmers and environmentalists.
  • Working from the Commons will allow the network effect to exponentially increase the power of each member.
  • It will be a showcase for Green technologies at a local level.
  • The Commons will provide more work options for our youth – a place to try out new business models in a supportive environment

I’ll be posting much more about the Tantramar Commons [a working name for now] as we develop the business model and the plan. I appreciate the support of many community organisations and individuals who have helped with this initiative and would like to recognise them, once I have their permission to do so.