Students, people, are nowadays trained to be sheep, trained to be 'fit for society', which is a society created by our parents, an industrial, assessable (if that's a word) society. Or at least, a high importance is put on assessing and evaluating anything in numbers and reports. I agree that is absolutely much more easier as an educational institution to assess a curriculum that teaches students to be sheep than to be wolves. When I tried to go my own way during college, I was highly demotivated by the challenges imposed by people and institutional bureaucracies to do this. Sometimes it even proved impossible, because it could not officially be included in the curriculum. Students are taught to be sheep. These well-trained sheep are confronted with complex situations during their education, but still, these are imposed by the uni, and even the methodologies to tackle them. After an expensive education of several years, students never have had incentives to go their own way, to be critical, to be innovative. They get a 'sheep'-certificate afterwards, which they can wave to enter some kind of sheep company. This is nowadays comparable with the industrial workers at the factories a century ago. Maybe they will now be the first ones to be replaced..

What I am wondering, are there any figures on how people act; whether some people are inherently sheep, and others are wolves, and whether a radical change in education has any influence on this?