The only thing is, the word "teaching" is a 2-way , I-Thou, "If a tree falls in a forest" type of word...If the learner doesn't learn, did the teacher teach? I don't think so. The word 'teaching' assumes learning. It is by definition a learner-centric word. So I think it is wrong to put "teaching centric" in opposition to "learning centric". Perhaps you could say "information-dispensing-centric".

(3 minutes later)
I wrote that paragraph then checked the dictionary. Turns out I'm wrong, at least by the definitions provided by the Oxford Canadian Dictionary. The main definition for 'teach' is to "give systematic information to (a person) about (a subject or skill)." This sounds like the teacher just has to give out information, with no responsibility to help the person learn it (unless that is what 'systematic' is implying).

Learning is only suggested in the third definition of 'teach': "enable (a person) to do something by instruction and training."

(1 minute of thought later)
No, the dictionary is wrong. Teaching does imply learning.