In most cases when I see INATT what I am seeing is a step in some sort of argument to the effect that things haven't change, or that they should not change. INATT means that the primary determinate is human nature, and human nature (so the argument goes) does not change.

Of course, the argument is not a successful one. For one thing, as you point out, it is also not about ignoring the technology. Even if our primary focus is human nature, technology plays a significant role. And second, human nature does change. What we want, what we believe, what we feel - all of these are influenced by technology. Directly.