Hi Harold,

Do you have a different link to this? "I showed the different types of work, and associated remuneration, available in the field."

Love the post, as always. It's still difficult to get folks to wrap their heads around the idea of workflow learning and learning as a way of being, for lack of a better term. I've begun just sending the link to Dave Cormier's latest video on Community as Curriculum lol

Do you think part of the struggle is that there are professions that require standardization to ensure public safety. People working in some fields need to meet a threshold of knowledge and demonstrated competency. To do that they need to be assessed and to create an assessment requires a level of standardization.

As these are still seen as the elite professions (doctors, nurses, architects, engineers, etc) lots of other professions use that style of learning and teaching as a model for other learning and teaching.. even though doctors, etc, often move into a workflow style learning once out of school.

There is also a whole feedback thing that doesn't get addressed enough. We have all kinds of unspoken rules about giving honest feedback to folks. How do we make the mind shift into real time, respectful and useful feedback within a workflow learning model? I think your latest post (abolish the org chart) might be part of the solution to that but it's only part, I suspect.

Rambling over for now :-)