I think harold that what you describe above will be used an argument for the l&d people who will defend the organization of class room trainings. Why? Because maybe not everybody has the discipline and energy to make time for sense making activities. And sometimes connecting different parts of information ( also a way of sense making) is a work done by the trainer. So maybe this means the future of PNL is just the future for knowledge workers .... And maybe worse: just for the not lazy ones. For example: I still see a lot of law people attending formal class room training because they want somebody else to pick up the info for them and make the connections. Curious to read what you think about that.