If the main point of that statement is that any statement "we" make about how "we" - all of us - are is likely to be limited by how "we" express ourselves and pay attention to others, then I agree fully. And I like the way you frame it. However, I don't perceive that this is generally understood to be the main point of that statement. It seems that a person has to be on the bad side of at least one of these blinkered "we" statements to fully understand why they are as dangerous as they are. Perhaps feeling the impact of a statement in which one has been summarily blocked from participation in humanity is a precursor to the true understanding of humanity. If so, may we all experience this event so that we may learn what "we" all truly are. I raise my hand to you, sir, in respect. My left hand, of course. ;-)