Agreed! I was wondering if, when you did the math, whether it worked out to be cheaper. When you remove the VC funding, and factor in real costs for licensing IP and the energy expenditure, if the savings are better than having a person. That is, when you make AI truly represent the costs, will it end up being cheaper than a person? Of course, that doesn't mean they won't go there anyway, and we should fight against it. When I was a kid, we were talking about how robots would mean we could work only a day or so a week. We chose, instead, to optimize profits for shareholders. Thinking that was the wrong choice...