Freedom for Learning Innovations

In a nutshell, one small company has applied for and received a number of
patents that they claim stake out their ownership of a wide range of the
processes underlying e-Learning. For example, they claim to have patented
the process of tracking learning based on jobs or test performance. In
addition, they claim to own the patents that break documents into learning
objects; and even to use one computer to access learning data from another
computer via a network.

They have gotten the patents and have filed multi-million dollar suits
against several of the e-Learning companies. A few of the e-Learning
companies have settled to avoid the huge cost of litigation and the fear
of losing in a trial. In conversations with the CEO’s of Learning and
Technology companies, it is clear that these lawsuits are going to add
increased costs that will be passed along to the customers, as well as
have a chilling effect on the e-Learning innovation process.

We MUST join together to overturn these patents by showing them to be
false and without basis. The company that is filing these suits is
called IpLearn (www.iplearn.com) They are a company with no products and
a patent attorney. Iplearn calls their business activity:
“intellectualware” They filed their patents between 1996 and 1999.

[You may contact them at – info@iplearn.com]To overturn these highly questionable patents what the industry needs to
do is to gather a full set of “Prior Art” that documents that e-Learning,
learning technology, adaptive testing and network based learning pre-dated
the papers written by these patent holders.

The MASIE Center is organizing a Freedom of Learning Innovation Project
with 2 simple goals:

1) Build a public domain listing of any individuals or companies that have
“Prior Art” that can be used to defend against these claims. If you have
printed manuals, software or other documentation showing the use of these
processes prior to 1996 please contact us. If you were personally
involved as a developer, customer or academic with adaptive testing or
network based learning prior to 1996, please contact us. We will build a
reference list of resources that can be used by any company defending
against the IpLearn lawsuits.

2) We want to provide STRONG SUPPORT for e-Learning companies to NOT
SETTLE these suits. As customers and users of e-Learning, we do not want
our vendors subject to this process of intimidation. There are clear
needs for reform of the Patent Process that allows these questionable
patents to be granted. But, in the meantime, customers of e-Learning
vendors must give them the support and backbone to fight and defend
against these suits. Tell your suppliers to join together to fight back!

Please send me an email if you can help in any way.

Yours in learning,

Elliott Masie

President, The MASIE Center
Founder, The e-Learning CONSORTIUM