The future of learning is DIY

If someone asks me what’s the best learning management system, my initial response is – Google. Donald Clark describes the top five global brands (Google, Apple, YouTube, Wikipedia, Starbucks) from the perspective of learning, with this comment:

Could it be that powerful, everyday “e-learning” has crept up on the world, separate from all the academic and institutional noise, and in a consumerist fashion?

All of these brands enable informal learning, grassroots knowledge management or collaboration on a local or global scale.

With Google you can find most information that you need. YouTube is a quick and easy way to get “learning objects” to the world. Apple gives the essential tools for knowledge workers, and in a nice package. Wikipedia has shown that the wisdom of crowds is just as good as the wisdom of elites. Starbucks gives free-agents and road warriors a place to meet and work. These top brands provide the equivalent of the interstate highway system for the creative age.

Enabling DIY (do-it-yourself) on the Web appears to be a good business model. Even on the fringes, such as wi-fi from a café. This is the power of informal learning, if organisations decide to enable it. It has to be DIY, user-driven and uncontrolled. People will figure out what’s best for them, as they have for millennia.

If you’re in the learning business, don’t try to build another LMS or portal. Instead, figure out ways that enable DIY. Believe it or not, learners can, and will, do the rest. They already are.

International Student Film & Photo Festival

This note was recently sent to me and I thought it would be worth passing on. It looks like a fun project for students. I’m told that either individual students or schools can enter:

River Valley Middle School proudly presents the 4th Annual River Valley International Student Film and Photography Festival. This year the festival is open to all schools (public and private) in all countries. The submission deadline will be the end of September 2007. Judging will take place in 3 locations throughout Canada and China during October with the awards show and webcast in December, 2007.

We have two divisions of the festival, Video and Photography. The Video division will be made up of Documentaries, Commercials, Drama’s, Comedies, and Animation’s. The Photography division will be made up of Landscape, People and Experimental categories. Schools can submit 9 photographs per category, for a total of 27 photographs and one film per category for a total of 5 films from each school.

The films must be no longer than 4 minutes in total length and must have been produced during the 2006 and 2007 school years. Films must be in AVI, .MOV or DVD format. Films will not be accepted that are in VHS or Mpeg format. Photographs must be digital, in jpeg, tiff or Raw format, with a resolution size capable for a 5 x 7 image and must have been produced during the 2006 and 2007 school year. Movies and Photographs will not be returned.

To view additional festival requirements and samples of winning Photographs and videos from previous year’s please check out the festival site: http://rvms.nbed.nb.ca/rvsvf/index.htm

This is a free contest which promotes student accomplishments and creativity.

Coyote Teaching

coyote.jpg

We’ve been talking about free-range learning, but another powerful metaphor is coyote teaching. Eric Hoefler [dead link] writes a thought-provoking article on the creative and destructive power of coyote, the trickster:

Tricksters live in between, answering yes and no at the same time and sincerely meaning both & thus, they are frustrating figures who offer no real answers, only more questions.
Tricksters are boundary-breakers and disruptors; they violate laws, morals, and customs; they invite chaos; they are disturbing and unsettling — but this very attribute is also part of their power to create and invent.
Tricksters are sneaky, greedy thieves — but their persistence is admirable and often leads to new solutions to a problem.
Tricksters are holy beings — though generally despised by the respectable members of the pantheon, they still rank as divine, meaning their methods may be oppositional, but what they do has lasting significance.

Coyotes leading free-range chickens has some interesting implications, but may illustrate the dynamic tension that is necessary for break-through learning. I’d suggest reading all of Hoefler’s post, and I intend to follow-up on some of the references.

Unschooling, our only option

We hit another brick wall this week and have pretty well decided to just stop trying to take on the public school system. The event that started it all was a school project requiring the creation of a poster on a selected disease. If nothing else, graduates of our school system will be highly-qualified poster makers.

The project completed on time by our son and a small group of students. However, the deadline was extended several times over many weeks, and the teacher would not accept any of the completed projects. This group of students then asked another teacher if they could store the posters in another classroom, which was allowed, but these posters were subsequently thrown in the garbage. Some said they saw the teacher throw them out, while the teacher said the janitor did it. It doesn’t really matter.

The teacher who assigned the project then told these students (the ones who had actually completed the project on time) that they would still have to do the project but would be given more time. Some of the students, like our son, had done the project at home and had a back-up electronic copy. Those who did the work on school computers did not have a copy.

The event created a bit of an uproar in our house. It reinforced my understanding that at school, doing the work and jumping through hoops is more important than learning. Confirmation of learning did not require another poster. I should add another important fact – all of the students did the identical project last year, and we even have last year’s poster filed away in a closet as proof.

This was not a very demanding project for the Grade 7 level and I question its validity. Pick a disease, look it up on the Net and create a poster that explains four aspects of the disease. Make sure the poster looks pretty so that it can add to the classroom decor. No discussion of how to use online resources, how to determine if a source is reliable or how to conduct research in general. In fact, these students have never in seven years of schooling been shown any process to do research – online or offline. This is what we concentrate on at home, on our own time.

We decided to just redo the poster and submit it without a fuss. We know from experience that if we complain, each family will be told to take it up with the individual teacher. We have made similar complaints over the past several years and have been assured by the administration that our concerns will be addressed (This is not a complaint that our boys are not getting good marks, as they both have consistently had +90% averages). We were told last year that projects would not be repeated from one year to the next for no reason.

We have realised that we cannot change the dictatorship of the classroom; the fact that the students are completely disempowered; an irrelevant curriculum; or that parents’ input is ignored by these “professional” teachers. I’ve noticed how the term professionalism gets thrown about a fair bit when school reform is discussed around here, especially by the teachers’ union. Let me again quote David Shaffer’s definition, from How computer games help children learn:

A professional is anyone who does work that cannot be standardized easily and who continuously welcomes challenges at the cutting edge of his or her expertise.

I agree with this definition. What I am seeing in the public school system are teachers who do not welcome challenges at the cutting edge of their expertise and whose output is becoming more and more standardized.

I am beginning to believe that demographics play a significant in this. Given that In 1999/2000, 34% of [Canadian] teachers were aged 50 or over, there is an obvious generation gap. For example, many teachers, the vast majority that we have encountered, have avoided any use of information and communication technologies to support their teaching. Given their age, it is common to hear that they don’t want or need to learn any new stuff before their eventual retirement.

As a result, the real digital divide seems to be between baby-boomer teachers and the Net generation. The examples given in class bear no resemblance to reality outside of class. The wonderful opportunities to link students to other learners around the world are lost. Even tools as simple as class blogs to post the homework assignments are not used. If the average age of our teachers was closer to 30 than 55, I feel that the situation might be different. When I was in school in the 1960’s and ’70’s we had many keen, young and energetic teachers. Perhaps the current situation will rectify itself in time.

Demographics or not, our mounting frustrations include arbitrary evaluations, irrelevant projects, a system that stonewalls any attempts at real conversation, and schools with little connection to the realities of the Internet Age. Therefore, we have decided that soon we will be unschooling in our own home.

unschool-bus.jpg

I cannot see any other option, as the problems are evident, the system will not change, and staying in the school system only gives it undeserved credibility. In September, we will be submitting our letter to New Brunswick’s Minister of Education:

The Minister shall, on application of the parent of a child, exempt in writing the child from attending school where the Minister is satisfied that the child is under effective instruction elsewhere.

Growing, changing, learning, creating

The conversation around informal learning has been heating up a bit lately, with Stephen Downes’ critique of Jay Cross’ mixer analogy, as well as Bill Brantley’s attack on the entire book.

Personally, I’ve really appreciated the insight that Tom Haskins has brought to the conversation. Tom picked up on my connecting informal learning with critical theory and then proceeded to develop the free range chicken metaphor. Tom followed this post with an examination of how informal learning on the Web eliminates the middle man, and therefore puts a lot of jobs in jeopardy (my last post is an example of how difficult it can be to continue the course-based e-learning business model).

Learning from learners and learning without content delivery – offers “no further income” for centralized production enterprises. It’s a similar problem that file sharing gives CD manufacturers, blogging gives print journalism and digital video gives movie houses. Perhaps a better term than early adopters would be ‘early defectors” or free agents, cultural creatives, long-tailers or Web 2.0 entrepreneurs.

Perhaps this is why the conversation is heating up. It’s dangerous to question other people’s modus vivendi.

Tom Haskins is a relatively new voice in the cross-connected blogs that I have consistently followed over several years, but he has been thought-provoking and respectful at the same time. Definitely worth a read at Growing, changing, learning, creating, if you haven’t been there yet.

Free Range Learning

Jay has used the term free range learning for a while in reference to informal learning and Tom Haskins has picked up on the free range chicken metaphor. Perhaps we need a cool logo to show that we support free range learning.

I grabbed this Public Domain graphic from Open Clip Art, but I’m sure there’s a graphic artist out there who could make a better graphic that we all could share. How about a graphical meme?

johnny_automatic_rooster_silhouette.jpg

Sheepwalking

Seth Godin calls it sheepwalking. I remember a non-job I had at defence headquarters, where I had to go to work but there was nothing to do most days. I could go on leave but I would use all of my allotted days and then I would still have to ‘go to work’ for the rest of the year. It didn’t matter that I had nothing to do, for I had to be at my place of duty. I was a sheepwalker, but within a year I was able to plot my way out and start my new vocation in the learning field.

Godin discusses how easy it is to develop sheepwalkers:

Training a student to be sheepish is a lot easier than the alternative. Teaching to the test, ensuring compliant behavior and using fear as a motivator are the easiest and fastest ways to get a kid through school. So why does it surprise us that we graduate so many sheep?

And graduate school? Since the stakes are higher (opportunity cost, tuition and the job market), students fall back on what they’ve been taught. To be sheep. Well-educated, of course, but compliant nonetheless.

Hugh MacLeod succinctly describes the situation that we all face, “The price of being a sheep is boredom. The price of being a wolf is loneliness. Choose one or the other with great care.”

Ever since I became a free-agent, there was no doubt which path I would follow, and I’m much happier today than I was as a sheepwalker some 15 years ago. Life still has its challenges — what I call the financial rollercoaster of working for yourself — but you’re alive and awake all of the time. The challenge now is to get some sleep when new ideas are spinning all around me.

One of the reasons I’m all fired up about the potential of informal learning on the Web is that it can let us be wolves in our learning. We have the means to connect with other members of the pack all over the world. We don’t have to revert to sheepdom so that we can be scheduled for the next course or workshop or whatever the all-knowing organisation has decided is best for us — “I don’t need your course, I’ll learn it on my own and I’ll find others who are willing to help me”.

In reading Jay Cross’ recent article, Stephen Downes basically asked what’s the underlying theory of informal learning. For me it’s clear — informal learning is linked to critical thinking and that is to question authority, seek the truth, and question our own perceptions of reality. Thinking for yourself may be subversive for the organisation but it is necessary for individual growth, as with any child growing into adulthood.

Like raising children, fostering independent learners may not give organisations their desired results, but it will give society the best results. Who knows, perhaps democracy may come to the business sector some day.

Teaching Defiance

I had the opportunity to listen to Anne Bartlett-Bragg’s podcast with Mike Newman, author of Teaching Defiance, while traveling last week. This cover note is what caught my attention:

This is a book about choice. It urges activist educators to help people break free from their pasts, take control of the present, and make deliberate, defiant choices about their futures. A true polemic, Teaching Defiance offers an exciting antidote to some of the formulaic writing in the fields of adult education, organizational learning, and human resource development.

Teaching Defiance sounds like the perfect book for any learning revolutionary. I made some notes while listening to the podcast and saw a clear linkage between critical theory and informal learning. Newman discusses three steps in the learning/teaching process. The first is Rational Discourse, which seems similar to traditional teaching. Here you get the facts and establish some common understanding. The second is Non-rational Discourse where learners gain non-teachable insight through various methods such as play or metaphor. The last step is Choose Action Well. This is where the learner exchanges stories and finds other people. I would also call this seeking meaningful conversations or networked learning. You have to seek out those who might shake your cognitive tree a bit, but you need a moral or philosphical framework from which to decide who you seek to converse with. Critical theory requires that you constantly question authority, including your own.

I have yet to pick up the book, but it’s on my list and I look forward to reading it. So far, there are no reader reviews on Amazon or Wiley.

By the way, I made these notes on my Moleskine notebook while on the plane.

Making sense of the Web

How do most people keep track of the growing amount of information that they receive? I’ve developed a personal knowledge management system, that works for me (for now, though it needs an overhaul). Managing information and keeping track of everything was a topic of conversation when four (now five) bloggers enjoyed a beer tasting and dinner in Las Vegas last week. Tony Karrer wondered if I found my Moleskine of any use, since he prefers entering notes straight to the computer. Since I type so slowly & poorly, a notebook makes more sense for me, and it’s quite portable. I admit that transcribing creates an extra step.

There was little doubt that two tools are critical in managing the information flow of the Internet Age – RSS aggregators to track blogs & news; and tagging to keep track of interesting things you find on the Net. I, for one, regularly search my tagged items and find this online database more flexible than browser-based Bookmarks or Favourites. Tagging is growing in popularity, as a recent PEW report shows that 28% of people on the Internet have tagged or categorized content.

Also, I think that there was general consensus amongst us that our blogs were great tools to help us make sense of all of this information, through writing and conversation online. Blogs give you a permanent location for your conversations and connecting with others. A blog can also be an online business card and introduction service.

Though blogs may not be for everyone, I would recommend, as a minimum, getting started with an aggregator and tagging (aka social bookmarking). These are the basic tools for self-directed learning on the Web, suitable for students, teachers, trainers, professionals and life-long learners.