International Student Film & Photo Festival

This note was recently sent to me and I thought it would be worth passing on. It looks like a fun project for students. I’m told that either individual students or schools can enter:

River Valley Middle School proudly presents the 4th Annual River Valley International Student Film and Photography Festival. This year the festival is open to all schools (public and private) in all countries. The submission deadline will be the end of September 2007. Judging will take place in 3 locations throughout Canada and China during October with the awards show and webcast in December, 2007.

We have two divisions of the festival, Video and Photography. The Video division will be made up of Documentaries, Commercials, Drama’s, Comedies, and Animation’s. The Photography division will be made up of Landscape, People and Experimental categories. Schools can submit 9 photographs per category, for a total of 27 photographs and one film per category for a total of 5 films from each school.

The films must be no longer than 4 minutes in total length and must have been produced during the 2006 and 2007 school years. Films must be in AVI, .MOV or DVD format. Films will not be accepted that are in VHS or Mpeg format. Photographs must be digital, in jpeg, tiff or Raw format, with a resolution size capable for a 5 x 7 image and must have been produced during the 2006 and 2007 school year. Movies and Photographs will not be returned.

To view additional festival requirements and samples of winning Photographs and videos from previous year’s please check out the festival site: http://rvms.nbed.nb.ca/rvsvf/index.htm

This is a free contest which promotes student accomplishments and creativity.

Coyote Teaching

coyote.jpg

We’ve been talking about free-range learning, but another powerful metaphor is coyote teaching. Eric Hoefler [dead link] writes a thought-provoking article on the creative and destructive power of coyote, the trickster:

Tricksters live in between, answering yes and no at the same time and sincerely meaning both & thus, they are frustrating figures who offer no real answers, only more questions.
Tricksters are boundary-breakers and disruptors; they violate laws, morals, and customs; they invite chaos; they are disturbing and unsettling — but this very attribute is also part of their power to create and invent.
Tricksters are sneaky, greedy thieves — but their persistence is admirable and often leads to new solutions to a problem.
Tricksters are holy beings — though generally despised by the respectable members of the pantheon, they still rank as divine, meaning their methods may be oppositional, but what they do has lasting significance.

Coyotes leading free-range chickens has some interesting implications, but may illustrate the dynamic tension that is necessary for break-through learning. I’d suggest reading all of Hoefler’s post, and I intend to follow-up on some of the references.

D + 3 (years)

intersection.jpg

My first post on this blog was on February 19th, 2004. The themes of learning, work & technology have remained the same, and over time I’ve added communities, the commons and informal learning.

I can’t imagine stopping this blog, as it’s been a wonderful way to take my half-baked ideas and get some great input from a worldwide community. I must say that I have been the primary beneficiary so I’ll continue to selfishly plug away.

Thanks to everyone who has joined in the conversation, as I really appreciate all of the feedback; positive and negative.

Perhaps it’s all about the technology

I’ve commented many times that the pedagogy is always more important than the technology, and it’s a common statement from many folks in the training and education field. However, I’m wondering if that’s not quite correct. Perhaps it’s all about the technology.

Consider the classroom. The technologies that are selected have a direct impact on the learning context. Desks, whiteboards, curriculum, class duration and tests are all technologies. By limiting access to certain technologies and adopting others, one makes decisions that strongly influence learning. Some technologies empower users while others empower administrators. If it wasn’t about technology, then the best education venue would still be a cave wall and we would not have made any progress since then.

The industrial schoolhouse was a technology designed to educate more students and prepare them for an industrial workplace. Some technologies we use, others we ignore and some we ban. These decisions indicate where we stand in terms of our ideas about individual rights, democracy, critical thinking and education itself.

Unless you’re teaching in Plato’s cave, you’ve made decisions about technology; implicit or explicit. Anyway, I’m starting to think that it’s all about the technology, or the technology choices that we make.

Unschooling, our only option

We hit another brick wall this week and have pretty well decided to just stop trying to take on the public school system. The event that started it all was a school project requiring the creation of a poster on a selected disease. If nothing else, graduates of our school system will be highly-qualified poster makers.

The project completed on time by our son and a small group of students. However, the deadline was extended several times over many weeks, and the teacher would not accept any of the completed projects. This group of students then asked another teacher if they could store the posters in another classroom, which was allowed, but these posters were subsequently thrown in the garbage. Some said they saw the teacher throw them out, while the teacher said the janitor did it. It doesn’t really matter.

The teacher who assigned the project then told these students (the ones who had actually completed the project on time) that they would still have to do the project but would be given more time. Some of the students, like our son, had done the project at home and had a back-up electronic copy. Those who did the work on school computers did not have a copy.

The event created a bit of an uproar in our house. It reinforced my understanding that at school, doing the work and jumping through hoops is more important than learning. Confirmation of learning did not require another poster. I should add another important fact – all of the students did the identical project last year, and we even have last year’s poster filed away in a closet as proof.

This was not a very demanding project for the Grade 7 level and I question its validity. Pick a disease, look it up on the Net and create a poster that explains four aspects of the disease. Make sure the poster looks pretty so that it can add to the classroom decor. No discussion of how to use online resources, how to determine if a source is reliable or how to conduct research in general. In fact, these students have never in seven years of schooling been shown any process to do research – online or offline. This is what we concentrate on at home, on our own time.

We decided to just redo the poster and submit it without a fuss. We know from experience that if we complain, each family will be told to take it up with the individual teacher. We have made similar complaints over the past several years and have been assured by the administration that our concerns will be addressed (This is not a complaint that our boys are not getting good marks, as they both have consistently had +90% averages). We were told last year that projects would not be repeated from one year to the next for no reason.

We have realised that we cannot change the dictatorship of the classroom; the fact that the students are completely disempowered; an irrelevant curriculum; or that parents’ input is ignored by these “professional” teachers. I’ve noticed how the term professionalism gets thrown about a fair bit when school reform is discussed around here, especially by the teachers’ union. Let me again quote David Shaffer’s definition, from How computer games help children learn:

A professional is anyone who does work that cannot be standardized easily and who continuously welcomes challenges at the cutting edge of his or her expertise.

I agree with this definition. What I am seeing in the public school system are teachers who do not welcome challenges at the cutting edge of their expertise and whose output is becoming more and more standardized.

I am beginning to believe that demographics play a significant in this. Given that In 1999/2000, 34% of [Canadian] teachers were aged 50 or over, there is an obvious generation gap. For example, many teachers, the vast majority that we have encountered, have avoided any use of information and communication technologies to support their teaching. Given their age, it is common to hear that they don’t want or need to learn any new stuff before their eventual retirement.

As a result, the real digital divide seems to be between baby-boomer teachers and the Net generation. The examples given in class bear no resemblance to reality outside of class. The wonderful opportunities to link students to other learners around the world are lost. Even tools as simple as class blogs to post the homework assignments are not used. If the average age of our teachers was closer to 30 than 55, I feel that the situation might be different. When I was in school in the 1960’s and ’70’s we had many keen, young and energetic teachers. Perhaps the current situation will rectify itself in time.

Demographics or not, our mounting frustrations include arbitrary evaluations, irrelevant projects, a system that stonewalls any attempts at real conversation, and schools with little connection to the realities of the Internet Age. Therefore, we have decided that soon we will be unschooling in our own home.

unschool-bus.jpg

I cannot see any other option, as the problems are evident, the system will not change, and staying in the school system only gives it undeserved credibility. In September, we will be submitting our letter to New Brunswick’s Minister of Education:

The Minister shall, on application of the parent of a child, exempt in writing the child from attending school where the Minister is satisfied that the child is under effective instruction elsewhere.

Growing, changing, learning, creating

The conversation around informal learning has been heating up a bit lately, with Stephen Downes’ critique of Jay Cross’ mixer analogy, as well as Bill Brantley’s attack on the entire book.

Personally, I’ve really appreciated the insight that Tom Haskins has brought to the conversation. Tom picked up on my connecting informal learning with critical theory and then proceeded to develop the free range chicken metaphor. Tom followed this post with an examination of how informal learning on the Web eliminates the middle man, and therefore puts a lot of jobs in jeopardy (my last post is an example of how difficult it can be to continue the course-based e-learning business model).

Learning from learners and learning without content delivery – offers “no further income” for centralized production enterprises. It’s a similar problem that file sharing gives CD manufacturers, blogging gives print journalism and digital video gives movie houses. Perhaps a better term than early adopters would be ‘early defectors” or free agents, cultural creatives, long-tailers or Web 2.0 entrepreneurs.

Perhaps this is why the conversation is heating up. It’s dangerous to question other people’s modus vivendi.

Tom Haskins is a relatively new voice in the cross-connected blogs that I have consistently followed over several years, but he has been thought-provoking and respectful at the same time. Definitely worth a read at Growing, changing, learning, creating, if you haven’t been there yet.

Provinent (Vitesse Learning) Files for Bankruptcy Protection

* Please see the Provinent Wiki for up to date information or to post any job offers. *

It’s now official. Provinent, an e-learning company in Fredericton and part of Vitesse Learning (I can’t figure out what name to use any more) has closed its doors.

From Fredericton’s Daily Gleaner:

Provinent, a local e-learning company, has laid off 44 workers from its Fredericton office after filing a notice of bankruptcy protection.
Ted Root, the CEO for Vitesse Learning in Toronto and Baltimore, Provinent’s parent company, sent a letter to dozens of employees throughout Atlantic Canada and Ontario on Tuesday informing them of the job losses.
The notice of bankruptcy leaves the provincial government on the hook for more than $1.5 million.
Provinent is an e-learning consulting and content-development company that provides custom learning systems.
Much of the contract work was done for clients in the U.S., but Canadian clients included Canadian Tire, Scotiabank and Maple Leaf Foods.
Root said Provinent foreclosed and subsequently shut down its U.S. operations.

The commentary can wait, but I’m sorry to hear that in the middle of Winter a lot of people are now out of work. I know what it’s like.

* Please see the Provinent Wiki for up to date information or to post any job offers. *

A Commons for the Creative Economy

I listened to the podcast of Richard Florida‘s presentation in Savannah, Georgia from December 2006 and I made a number of notes that seem to bear directly on how our Commons can help to prepare the town for the societal changes that we are beginning to experience in how we work, where we work, and when we work.

First of all, I felt reassured that the Commons is on the right track when Florida stated that his data show that knowledgeable, innovative and creative people attract more of the same. This means that jobs move to the people, not the reverse. An essential idea of our Commons is to attract and retain creative people in our community.

According to Florida, we are living through the biggest economic transformation in history – from a physical capital economy to one of human creativity. He specifically refers to the decrease in manufacturing sector jobs and the increase in creative jobs (entertainment, art, science, technology, design, etc). Creative work currently accounts for one-third of the US economy, and it is increasing. However, to be truly successful we will need to integrate creativity into all of our sectors, including the lower-paid service sectors, where every person is valued for their creativity. Florida says that this is possible in the same way that business and government cooperated to make manufacturing a high-wage sector.

In order to be part of the creative economy, cities (hopefully towns as well) have to understand the creative community needs pyramid. These needs have to be addressed to attract creative people, who will be the engines of future economic growth.

Basic Needs must be addressed first but addressing the higher needs of Lifestyle and Values are what will attract the creative class. This class is not differentiated by age, sex, education or income; as other classes have been in the past. The creative class in many cases are the marginalized or those living at the edges of the community. For instance, being open-minded and tolerant is not only attractive for recent university graduates but for the poor as well. Creativity can and does come from all socio-economic classes.

florida-pyramid.jpg

I envision our Commons to be a creative garage where innovative ideas can be tinkered with and anyone can drop by and get involved in the process. One idea that is forming is to have a completely public & open space as well as a members-only area within the Commons. In conjunction with other aspects of our town, such as the university and our natural spaces, the Commons can be one component in building a resilient and dynamic community for the creative economy.

Free Range Learning

Jay has used the term free range learning for a while in reference to informal learning and Tom Haskins has picked up on the free range chicken metaphor. Perhaps we need a cool logo to show that we support free range learning.

I grabbed this Public Domain graphic from Open Clip Art, but I’m sure there’s a graphic artist out there who could make a better graphic that we all could share. How about a graphical meme?

johnny_automatic_rooster_silhouette.jpg