eLearning without Cash

Ismael Pena Lopez has a post on ICTlogy on how to develop elearning at no cost ($) for non-profit organisations. His premise is that there are three main components to elearning – human resources, content and technology. Ismael says that you can develop a programme using e-Volunteers, an open source LMS and freely available content. Of course there is still a lot of sweat equity necessary, but a non-profit could develop some pretty good programmes using volunteers and a simple but robust technology platform, like wikipedia has done, where the content experts do not get a nickel.

My experience with elearning implementation is that most of the costs are incurred by adding administrative controls, like reports and tracking. Reducing administrative control would lessen the demands on the e-Volunteers and you would be left with your hosting costs. This could work fairly well, especially if the volunteers had a simple way to contribute to content development, mentoring, assessment, etc. I am sure that a lot of content and learning specialists in the world would help out with elearning programmes, like The Campus for Peace, if there was an easy mechanism to do so. It could be like a virtual Peace Corps. The key, I believe, is to lower the barriers to becoming a virtual volunteer and ensuring the fewest intermediaries are involved.

By the way, is anyone interested in volunteering to develop elearning programmes on wildlife and environmental education?

Update: And now via ICTlogy comes Blogger Corps, matching bloggers with activists and non-profit groups who want to blog and need help getting started.

Everything you wanted to know about Open Source …

The MOST workshop took place yesterday in Moncton. The presentations went as scheduled, though mine was cut from the end. You can get some of it from my post on OS Business Models. Steve has posted his comments on the sessions, and I agree with most of them, unfortunately. It was a pretty diverse group, and I know that some people (including me) got lost in a few of the technical discussions. Steve has also identified a need for a simple explanation of Open Source:

Given some time I’m going to produce an "Everything you want to know about Open Source", 15 minute and 10 slide presentation that anyone can download to keep themselves on track. CC’d etc. Note the "want" in "want to know".

I believe that Steve has set a challenge. I will do the same, and share it. Any one else want to join in? Once the pitch is developed- so that my mother can understand it – then perhaps someone may be interested in creating an animation, ?ɬ† la Creative Commons. I’ll post my work in progress.

Update: Steve has started the discussion here.

Open Source Software Business Models

In preparation for the MOST Workshop in Moncton tomorrow, I thought I’d provide some links to business models that are being used with open source software (OSS).

At the KMDI conference this Summer, Matt Asay described three business models for OSS (Commodity, Brand & Service, Pragmatic) .

John Koenig, in the IT Manager’s Journal discusses seven business strategies for OSS:

  1. The Optimization Strategy (where one layer of a software stack is “modular and conformable,” allowing adjacent software layers to be “optimized.”)
  2. The Dual License Strategy (offering free use of software with some limitations, or alternatively offering for a fee commercial distribution rights and a larger set of features.)
  3. The Consulting Strategy (reduce or remove licensing costs and sell services)
  4. The Subscription Strategy (selling OSS maintenance on a yearly basis)
  5. The Patronage Strategy (where original equipment manufacturers support OSS in order to create an environment for other products and services)
  6. The Hosted Strategy (using OSS to provide your services, e.g. Google)
  7. The Embedded Strategy (using OSS in hardware to increase market acceptance)

The Open Source Initiative states that there are “at least four known business models for making money with open source”:

  1. Support Sellers (otherwise known as “Give Away the Recipe, Open A Restaurant”): In this model, you (effectively) give away the software product, but sell distribution, branding, and after-sale service.
  2. Loss Leader: In this model, you give away open-source as a loss-leader and market positioner for closed software.
  3. Widget Frosting: In this model, a hardware company (for which software is a necessary adjunct but strictly a cost rather than profit center) goes open-source in order to get better drivers and interface tools cheaper.
  4. Accessorizing: Selling accessories – books, compatible hardware, complete systems with open-source software pre-installed.

Frank Hecker, has added to these four models with:

  1. “Brand Licensing,” in which a company charges other companies for the right to use its brand names and trademarks in creating derivative products.
  2. “Sell It, Free It,” where a company’s software products start out their product life cycle as traditional commercial products and then are continually converted to open-source products when appropriate.
  3. “Software Franchising,” a combination of several of the preceding models (in particular “Brand Licensing” and “Support Sellers”) in which a company authorizes others to use its brand names and trademarks in creating associated organizations doing custom software development in particular geographic areas or vertical markets, and supplies franchises with training and related services in exchange for franchise fees of some sort.

Much of what is written about OSS is from the perspective of those who develop and support the software. I think that a greater potential, especially for small businesses, is to use OSS in order to significantly reduce costs. With Mancomm, we reduced costs for a pilot project by using open source. The client saved about $1M over previous estimates. The same approach is used by another of my partners, PSI, to keep costs down and focus on developing the right models before investing in any new technology. In each case, the client does not incur license fees and can even decide not to implement after a pilot project and not worry about getting a return on the license fees. OSS is lower risk, especially for test and pilot projects, thereby encouraging innovation.

Firefox 1.0 – Beginning or End?

Dan James has a good post on the issues facing the Mozilla Foundation and Firefox as they get ready to launch Firefox 1.0, and deal with success.

Firefox is going to be the first open source project to get mass market adoption. Unlike PHP and Apache people will actually choose to use it. It takes a conscious decision to use Firefox whereas with PHP and Apache average folks use them without knowing. Millions of average people are going to use Firefox. My mom will use it.

I installed Firefox for the rest of my family about two months ago, and it is performing without a hitch. This is truly open source for the masses. We are entering an era of open source for the public that may be the beginnining of something truly revolutionary. If OpenOffice 1.2 has the same ease of use that Firefox 1.0 has, then we may see a much larger adoption of open source for the desktop.

Maritimes Open Source Technologies

NRC – IIT is sponsoring an afternoon workshop on open source software, that will preceed the Moncton Cybersocial on November 10th. The workshop takes place from 2:00 PM to 4:30 PM at the Universit?ɬ© de Moncton’s Engineering Building [?É‚Ä?difice du g?ɬ©nie], Room 147G-2. All information on the workshop, as well as the Cybersocial will be posted on the new Cybersocial website for the Greater Moncton Knowledge Industry Network.

Speakers include Peter Burtt of the Moncton LUG, William Langley from NRC IRAP, Harold Boley of NRC IIT, Stephen Downes of NRC-IIT eLearning, and Ren?ɬ© Richard & Dr. Keith Wilson of NRC-IIT eHealth. I will be finishing the session with a short panel discussion on open source as a business opportunity. The event is followed by the Cybersocial at the Manhattan Grill and a presentation on open source from David Fellows of Fellows & Carr.

Hope to see you there, and you may want to register (no charge), as the organisers expect all 107 seats to be taken.

Future Business Models

In many discussions around business model innovation today, three companies are consistently mentioned – Google, Amazon and eBay [no links here, as everyone knows where to find them]. Pierre Omidyar, founder of eBay, is working on a number of new projects, and if you want to get an indicator of future business models in the digital economy, then consider his areas of concentration:

Since June we have funded efforts in a number of areas:


* Microfinance

* Bottom-up Media

* Open Source

* Intellectual Property

* Voting

* Social Software

The Omidyar Network has some great partners, including Creative Commons and Source Forge.

Via Kathleen.

OpenOffice Celebrates Fourth Birthday

OpenOffice, the free and open source office application, turned four years old this month. I have been using it for two years, and swear by it. OOo (as it’s referred to) is similar to MS Office, with a word processing application, presentation creator, spreadsheet and HTML editor. With free software, I can insist that my sub-contractors use it, at no additional cost to them. The applications are just as easy to use as Corel’s or Microsoft’s, but there are fewer errors. I have developed +100 page documents in OOo and then exported them as Adobe PDF files (a great feature), without a glitch. OOo files are about 1/5 the size of equivalent MS Word documents, and about 1/3 the size of the same PDF. This makes shipping documents to those on dial-ups a lot easier.

You can download OOo for Windows, Mac or Linux, and try it out to see if you like it. You can also purchase one of several available books, including Open Office for Dummies, if you need a manual.

So here is a free software suite that is compatible with MS Office (you can save as .PPT or .DOC or .XLS ), is easy to use, and is supported by a large user community. You can also purchase support packages from one of several vendors. So what are you waiting for? You have nothing to lose but your upgrade fees.

Open Source Medical Journal

PLoS [Public Library of Science] Medicine is a peer-reviewed medical journal available free online, with a Creative Commons license for use. Here is one reason why it was created:

Whereas some would argue that medical journals should not be accessible to patients because patients are unable to use the information effectively, we believe it is our responsibility as publishers and members of the medical community not only to give patients access, but to provide them with tools to use the medical literature wisely. Medical research is a partnership between medical scientists and millions of voluntary human participants, conducted largely with public funds. What better way to acknowledge the public’s contribution and ensure their willingness to sponsor and participate in future research than to openly share the product of this research with them?

It could be interesting to examine the differences in usage between PLoS Medicine, which is geared toward both practitioners and the public, with another source built expressly for use by the public, such as the Canadian Health Network.

Drupal 4.5 Released

Drupal, the open source content management system (OS CMS) that this site is built on, just keeps getting better. This is a dynamic developer community that takes to heart the comments of users in order to build better "community plumbing". With the release of Drupal 4.5 we are seeing mutiple themes, a tabbed interface and a new look on the Drupal site, as well as many other features. Drupal is a major player in the OS CMS space, and I think will stay the course, due to the commitment of so many in the community. Thanks to Chris and Cameron for seeing the potential of Drupal many months ago.

For those new to CMS’s, take a look at the Drupal brochure (PDF).

Innovative Entrepreneurs

Dave Pollard has written a concise article on how to stimulate and measure Canadian innovation. He trashes the methods used by the federal government and the BC science council to measure and promote innovation. I agree with his verdict – they’re lame.

And if you want to stimulate innovation, invest in the people that live and die by innovation — entrepreneurs. Their profits stay in the community, get reinvested, and create jobs. By all means subsidize those entrepreneurs to do their research at Canadian universities — you better believe that research will be focused on commercial opportunity.

To continue the thread started by the Atlantic open source gatherings this Summer, as well as the blogger meeting in Moncton this week, the common threads of interest appear to be:

  1. open source models for software, innovation and learning
  2. new business models, including natural enterprises
  3. networking and learning in the digital commons (blogs, YASNS, wikis, etc)
  4. economic development at a grassroots level in Atlantic Canada

I’m sure that many of the small, outwardly focused, technologically savvy companies in the region would not been impressed by measurements like "percent of population completing university", as a means to determine innovation. There are many successful entrepreneurs here who have skipped university in order to really innovate.

At the blogger dinner in Moncton there were at least three new business initiatives that we discussed and these will be followed-up. Not bad for seven folks in the space of a couple of hours. This was more successful in fostering innovation that most sponsored conferences on innovation. So let’s keep the conversation going, especially in the blogosphere, and let’s have a mass innovation meet next month. With 20 to 30 entrepreneurial individuals networking over pizza & beer (or your choice of brain food) I’m certain that we can start an Atlantic movement to help each other, and kick butt internationally.

All of the ingredients are here – smart people, nimble companies, a sense of community, existing relationships, and a hunger for something better. There are still a number of us who have to get to know each other a bit better, so I hope to see many of you in Sackville at the end of next month.

Please post your comments as well as your preferred dates.