Stephen Downe’s post about the value of LO’s reflects my own consternation – are they of any utility? (My emphasis added)
In the world of e-learning, meanwhile, the systems and protocols look more and more like jibberish each passing day as every possible requirement from every possible system – whether it makes sense or not – is piled into that tangle of 24-character variable names called Java (none of which will work at all unless you have exactly the right configuration, somewhat like my database). Again, maybe it’s just me, but it seems to me that if you need an advanced degree to make this stuff work (and of course it have to be exactly the right kind of degree) then it’s just not going to work. It won’t, it can’t. Because learning, above all, must be a populist enterprise. Now I’m not proposing that we go back to the world of stone tools and chalk. But the last time I looked people weren’t using learning objects in any great number, either in the classroom or (even more so) to support home learning. Gosh, make sure you can float before building a battleship.
I see a lot more day-to-day value for learning in the use of simple technologies like blogs, RSS and trackbacks. Not all of the blog systems are compatible and you will find technical hurdles, but my blog is becoming a valuable learning tool, and it is very learner-centric. It’s also standards compliant, cheap and easy to use.