e-Learning 2.0 with Stephen Downes (IIL07)

by

Stephen is addressing the conference with his opening keynote this morning. I’m sitting way back in the audience of about 500 people:

iil07.JPG

This conference is an excellent mix of presenters, vendors and participants. I’ve found the level of conversation more in-depth than larger conferences I’ve attended. Stephen has set up a back channel with an ad hoc chat he’s set up on his web site. We’re starting to get several comments coming up on the dual screens. I think that the back channel is very new to many in the audience and there’s some confusion with multiple sensory inputs. Of course, it’s normal for anyone doing collaborative learning on the web.

Life in Beta and learning as flow, are my own recurring themes here. Stephen is talking about connectivism and network learning (as well as unworkshops, unconferences, messiness, etc.). Good themes to launch this conference.

Innovations Outside of Learning (IIL07)

by

Tom Crawford opened the conference today with ” Innovations Outside of Learning: How external forces are changing our world”. It was a great way to get the ideas flowing and people thinking about the last 100 years of technology and learning. Tom listed his top 10 nine technologies of the past five years that have affected learning. I really liked his first pick, as I think that we have only touched the tip of the iceberg with performance support on the Web.

  1. Performance support
  2. Gaming and simulation
  3. Self-publishing
  4. Collaboration
  5. Web services and mash-ups
  6. High bandwidth to the hand
  7. New input devices (e.g. wii)
  8. Video and image search
  9. Embedded devices

Innovations in Learning Conference (IIL07)

by

I’m in Santa Clara for the Brandon Hall Innovations in Learning Conference. Last night we went to Santa Cruz for seafood on the pier, with the sound of sea lions around us. It was too dark to get a photo of these interesting animals, but I thought this sign was kind of neat. We did not feed the birds.

directions.jpg

Janet and I will be presenting our workshop tomorrow. For pictures, go to the Flickr group, and if you’re attending, please post and share.

The end of content-centric business models

by

Fewer people believe that “content is king” in the online learning world. However, many e-learning business models are built on some aspect of content creation. Community and context are the two critical factors in developing e-learning environments. For example:

  • Courses online; Community = your cohort; Context = a relevant (to you) credential
  • Performance support; Community = your peers; Context = current need
  • Knowledge Management (especially PKM) ; Community = those with shared interests; Context = Maslow’s higher needs of esteem and self-actualization.

These thoughts were triggered by Rob Paterson’s post that Getting paid for content is over:

All business models must be based on something that is legitimately scarce. Today, no matter how expensive it is to make, content will become freely available quickly. So much music is free that you cannot legitimately charge much for a song. So much film is free that you cannot charge much for a move. So much information is free, that you cannot charge much for it (Britannica). This is a reality – so you have to get over it and find another area that is legitimately scarce where you can find value. So where is it?

What happens to e-learning business models when content declines in value? Will it be more profitable to a have a learning content management system or a people connecting (e.g. Facebook) system? If the best lectures & videos are available online for free, why build mediocre substitutes? What will happen to custom content development?

I’m not saying that these changes will happen immediately, but there does seem to be a trend toward free and ubiquitous digital media. Isn’t it just a matter of time before it hits the e-learning field?

The knowledge economy is the trust economy

by

From the Creative Class blog is part of a WSJ article on telecommuting:

“When companies allow employees to work remotely or from home, they are explicitly communicating to them that ‘I trust you to be dedicated to the accomplishment of the work, even if I’m not able to observe you doing it,’ ” says Jack Wiley, executive director of the institute, which is in Minneapolis. “It boils down to respect,” he says. “I respect you and I have confidence in your commitment to the work — to do this under the conditions and at the time you feel will be most productive for you.”

Lack of trust is a major barrier to using decentralized methods and processes that enhance information sharing and collaboration, two factors for success in a knowledge economy. However, many of our industrial organisations are not exactly jumping on the telecommuting bandwagon. Articles in the main stream press are indicators that the status quo may not last.

As I’ve been working on my own for several years now, I see first hand the advantages of distance work. It’s good for the environment, cheaper, and I’m happier and more productive when I’m in control of my schedule. Meetings are less frequent and usually more focused. I’ve noted before that collaborating at a distance is sometimes more effective than being in the same room.

Trust is the glue that holds knowledge organisations together, not rules and regulations.  It’s something to consider when developing a recruitment and retention strategy.

e-Learning Bootcamp Next Week

by

Join Me at The Brandon Hall Innovations in Learning Conference Community!

This is my “quick connect card” for the Innovations in Learning Conference. One week from today, Janet Clarey and I will be conducting a workshop [a.k.a. Bootcamp] on e-learning. We’ve had a chance to talk to some of the participants and the final outline is shaping up. We’re planning on using a flexible framework and hope to run it more like an unconference.

Themes so far include e-learning today & tomorrow,  case studies, networks & informal learning and personal learning environments. There are still a few places left if you’re interested in this pre-conference workshop on 24 September in Santa Clara, California.

Green4Generations

by

Update: Green4Generations has its own website.

Saturday was the first Green4Generations festival and trade fair in Sackville, organised by Wanderlust outfitters. Many groups came out to show what can be done locally to reduce our environmental impact. The day ended with a presentation by Peter Corbyn of The Inconvenient Truth slideshow, which was worth seeing a second time for me. For a town of 5,000 people we have a lot going on, from a solar heating company to recycled art and a green builders cooperative.

One of the newest groups is our community supported agriculture (CSA) association which launched its first local vegetable service this Summer. The main driver behind this initiative, in addition to local demand, is a young family that has decided to create a better world by growing food in a sustainable way. Kent and Ruth run Nature’s Route Farm just outside of town and have been supplying weekly food baskets to 20 families. This is expected to grow to 60 families for next year, and the produce includes local vegetables as well as eggs. The Sackville CSA also sources organic flour from Speerville Mill and other seasonal delicacies.

To really combat global warming, we all have to get involved, politically and locally. Here is Kent at the Fair, and his reason for involvement is pretty obvious:

natures-route-farm.JPG

Blogging in the Public Sector

by

Several people have already mentioned the report by David Wyld on, The Blogging Revolution: Government in the Age of Web 2.0. This is a US-centric report that not only covers the public sector and elected officials but has a fairly comprehensive section on the history of blogging. For anyone not engaged and wanting to get up to speed, this report would be a good addition to the book Naked Conversations: How Blogs are Changing the Way Businesses Talk with Customers.

It’s too bad that Wyld’s report is only available as a 7.2 MB PDF, but it’s suitable for those who prefer to read from paper (maybe on an airplane). From the report is a quick review on why you should blog (something that is still asked a lot):

Yet, the most important part of blogging may not be obvious to the blogger himself, as the very exercise of writing the blog raises one’s self-awareness. And by virtue of its being in the public sphere, “these fragments, pieced together over months, can provide an unexpectedly intimate view of what it is to be a particular individual in a particular place at a particular time” (Blood, 2000, n.p.). According to a recent survey of bloggers, approximately half of them view their blogging activity as a form of therapy (eMarketer, 2005b). Indeed, writing has been shown to be an extremely powerful activity; the more one writes, the better one thinks (Manjoo, 2002b). This can be an important method of self-development for everyone. For executives or public officials, this means they can use the blog as a means of self-analysis; at the same time, the organization’s stakeholders can gain a better awareness of the individual in the office. In the view of Dave Sifry, CEO of Technorati, a blog can be looked upon as “the record of the exhaust of a person’s attention stream over time.” He continued, “You actually feel like you know the person. You see their style, the words they use, their kids, whatever there is” (quoted in Penenberg, 2005, n.p.).

Netiquette 2.0

by

I recently received another request for information about blogging. It could have been e-learning, Web 2.0 or some other area, but a freelance writer found me online and asked for my input for an upcoming article. For the past several years I have given free advice and comments to anyone who asks. Here are two examples:

  1. A few months back I received a well-worded request for an interview from Joe Horne, as part of a graduate class project of his. I consented to the interview, at a time of my choosing, and we had a great discussion. Joe followed-up with a handwritten thank you card. I must say that Joe’s extra effort was really appreciated.
  2. This week I answered a series of questions that had been e-mailed to me by a freelance writer for a business magazine, without any previous contact. There was an additional request that I respond within two days. I answered the questions almost immediately and sent off my response. So far, not even a thank-you in return.

After four years in the free information business I wonder if I should have a policy on being a source. I have no hesitation in helping any bloggers who also make their information available. I also don’t mind helping researchers and students who are disseminating their findings. However, I’m starting to feel used in providing free (and synthesized) information or advice to someone who is being paid to collect it.

This issue has reminded me of a story that I previously reported, in Good manners are still important. It was about an uninvited “professional” dropping in on some bloggers and expecting to be treated as an equal, or even a celebrity. This uninvited guest assumed, incorrectly, that the corporate hierarchy prevailed.

In a wirearchy, your position means much less than your value to the network. For instance, everything on this site is free and licensed for sharing and all of the content is searchable. This adds a certain amount of value to the overall network.

A few years back, Netiquette was about “NOT ALL CAPS” and enhancing communications. Netiquette 2.0 should focus on sharing and enhancing the network, not just drawing from it.

etiquette.jpg