Local Industry and Researchers Gather

Last night was the monthly gathering of the Moncton area knowledge and IT industry, hosted by Mount Allison University’s research services. I really enjoyed Bruce Robertson’s presentation on his work with the semantic web, and more specifically the Historical Event Markup and Linking Project. It’s great to know a professor of Classics who also runs his own Linux server.

Another event of note that was announced last night is the free Ruby on Rails workshop to be held in Moncton on 10 Oct 2007, to be followed by a two-day training session. The host, Spheric, is a local company that has embraced open source development applications in order to better grow its business and offer enterprise-level software.

Web tools for critical thinking

A few years back, Dave Pollard wrote a post on critical thinking and it’s one that I’ve referred to a few times since. I think that real critical thinking is a key survival skill in our global, digital surround.

What I think really needs to be taught is critical thinking as a defensive skill. We all think logically, but we can be fooled. Inadvertently or maliciously. If I were to design a Critical Thinking course it would quickly cover the basic cognitive skills, and provide some exercises for students to get these muscles working, and would then focus entirely on learning to challenge intellectual deception.

criticalthinking.gif
Almost every interest group in the world is now on an information & marketing offensive. It’s what Seth Godin calls a Marketing War, and if every corporate, government and special interest group masters it, we had all better watch out. To fight this war, we now have a few new tools at our disposal to help us question assumptions, including our own.

Looking at several web tools from the perspective of critical thinking, and the processes described by Dave, shows something similar to a personal learning environment (PLE). You could call it a PLE with an attitude, or PKM, and educators can start with the book, “Teaching Defiance“.

PLE’s et al

“But it’s alright now, I’ve learned my lesson well.
“You see, you can’t please everyone, so you’ve got to please yourself” Ricky Nelson

I’ve been getting some questions about personal learning environments and of course hearing and reading lots about them in the past few months. If I thought about the PLE, it was a concept around the use of tools and processes to be a better learner. The PLE was akin to the process of personal knowledge management (PKM), in that it was a sense-making effort.

Some of the discussions around PLE’s seem to be going in the direction of PLE-as-platform, like a learning management system (LMS).  Having a “PLE in a box” might please everyone, but learners have to please themselves.

Tom Haskins has been adding excellent insight into this conversation, first with The LMS vs PLE Debate and then  Growing PLE’s from Seed and now PLE’s come in sizes :

When we think of Personal Learning Environments as things, we are on the same page as construction workers, factory stewards and warehouse operators. We are dealing with the components to assemble a PLE. We describe the PLE as “what we’ve got in it” like Web 2.0 tools and archives of our own creations.

When we think of PLE’s as processes, we’re on the same page as designers of architecture, software interfaces and customer experiences. We’re dealing with what components do, how they function, what purpose they serve, and which difference they make. These intangible qualities are more difficult to visualize.

It’s like electricity, which can be thought of as particles or as a current. PLE’s, in their current free-form, are what individuals are putting together because the tools are cheap and available. The processes are drawn from many fields – knowledge management, cognitive science, information architecture, etc. These processes, with newer tools every day, are fairly ill-defined.

Who knows where the PLE will go, but let’s give it a chance to grow first. Seeing how various artists use some kind of PLE would be fascinating and much more informative for our field than any standard PLE format selected by company ABC for all of its employees.

New Brunswick’s Education Plan

nb-flag.gif

Over 50 of us had dinner with the Minister of Education on Friday night. I wasn’t sure what to expect, and as many of you know, I’m highly critical of industrial education. After the speech, I didn’t have much to disagree with. If this government follows through on its vision and promises, then we may see some real changes that will help our children become active and contributing citizens.

Kelly Lamrock spoke about community schooling, local learning options, an innovation fund and co-op programs. He challenged local business and non-profit groups to get involved with their schools. I have accepted this challenge, and it helped that two school principals were sitting at my table. We will discuss how we can integrate the Atlantic Wildlife Institute into the curriculum and also how I can help teachers understand Web tools for learning. There is a real atmosphere of openness, that I have not sensed for the past decade.

From the government document, When Kids Come First:

In the world that awaits, one of the skills most in demand will be the ability to solve problems. Following instructions will be work done in low-wage economies, or by machines. The people who control their economic future will be the kids who went through school solving problems and challenging themselves, not just following instructions.

And in that global world that awaits, our children will actually need a stronger sense of community than ever before. We’re not training — “we are teaching citizens, parents and leaders. That means we need to make our children feel anchored in a community where their actions touch the lives of others, where we give them a sense of our history, culture, languages and values — and a sense of belonging here at home.

I’m impressed with the government’s vision, knowing the challenges of changing a system that has been chugging along just fine for a century. I also know that all of us will have to get involved now, so that we don’t lose momentum. Many people will be threatened by changes to a more flexible and transparent learning environment, and at the first sign of difficulties reactionary forces will try to move back the clock. Carpe diem, New Brunswick.

Personal Environments

[This is very much a work in progress]

David Dalgado has put up a graphic of his personal learning environment, using categories of Main Tool, Browser, LMS, News, Search, Communication, Knowledge base, Social Networks and Web Apps. When I examined my Web tools at the time, I came up with Main Professional Site, Information Management, Productivity Tools and Social Networks. This view was a bit different from my Personal Knowledge Management system, last year. This process consisted of Pulling, Sorting, Categorizing, Reflecting & Commenting, and Finding. In all of these cases, the individual decides what to connect to, choosing the intensity of the bonds with people or information.

Whichever view you consider, there are multiple aspects of personal learning and sense-making, enough to fill several books (or one big wiki). These new tools on the Web are making it easier to cobble together something that works for each of us. Jane Hart’s Top 100 list, shows the wide variety of tools available.

Connections, enabled by these tools, are starting to matter more in our work and our learning. We can connect with work, love, entertainment and meaning online. That’s why I’m to trying to find patterns in how these personal spaces have been created.

Mark Federman’s Valence Theory of Organization provides a most interesting lens to view our connections and I look forward to his future publications.

I identify several specific forms of valence relationships that are enacted by two or more people when they come together to do almost anything; these are economic, social-psychological, identity, knowledge, and ecological. An organization is thus defined as that complex, emergent entity which occurs when two or more people, or two or more organizations, or both, share multiple valences at various strengths, with various pervasiveness, among the component elements. Using this as a definition of organization has profoundly disruptive implications for every aspect of management, governance, and engagement that we have come to know over the last hundred or so years.

If individuals have stronger learning bonds outside school than inside, what happens to education? If there are stronger economic bonds through your network than your current job, what happens to the industrial workplace?

valences.jpg

As we are able to connect to anyone at any time, as well as have access to information as we need it, the organisation of the past century is starting to look like a hollow shell.

valences2.jpg

Doing time in high school

The Milgram Experiments demonstrated that normal people can easily do nasty things to other people if an expert tells them what to do. The Stanford Prison Experiment showed that normal people act like sadistic guards when placed in a “prison-like” environment. Today, in New Brunswick, we are making our schools more like prisons. Video surveillance cameras will be installed in all high schools in School District 2.

Of course, we have been assured that the cameras will only be used ethically and in the best interests of the students; but power corrupts. No public consultations preceded this decision. Video surveillance is one more control tool to be used “against” students, without their consent. Treat people like prisoners and sure as anything, they will start to act like prisoners.

Alternatives to technologies of control are available, cheaper and more ethical. First, build smaller schools, where everyone can feel at home. The maximum number of students per school should be 150 [Dunbar’s number]. Getting all teachers out of the staff room and into the halls, interacting with students, might put a more human face on the institution as well. Give students increasing amounts of control so that by Grade 12 they are able to make their own decisions about curriculum, homework, study time, etc. The more control you have, the less you feel like a prisoner, isn’t that correct, Employee #12 in Cubicle Zone D?

It seems as if our education system is trying as hard as possible to disempower and alienate an entire generation.

INATT

Jay Cross is working on a research paper, which if it turns into a book, he will name it INATT (it’s not about the technology).

  • Blogging isn’t about the technology, it’s about easily publishing your thoughts and allowing others to join in and add to them.
  • Wikis aren’t about the technology, they’re an easy way for everyone to write, edit and comment on the same space and not worry about operating systems or word processor document formats.
  • RSS isn’t about the technology, it’s about having one place to watch the multi-person, multi-channel, multi-perspective Web universe.
  • Podcasts aren’t about the technology, they’re a way to share your voice and let others listen on their own terms and on their own time.
  • Multi-player roleplay games aren’t about the technology, they’re about immersing yourself in another world and learning things you might not in real life.

Many people cannot use these practical tools in school or at work. If it’s not about the technology, why are we letting IT departments decide what’s best for us?

Hard Work

Graham commented on my back to school post, “Screw literacy, it’s thinking that’s died“, and I replied that I would rather work with a thinking illiterate partner than an unthinking literate one. Literacy and numeracy are great skills and may make for a productive workforce but critical thinking (questioning all assumptions, as well as your own) is much more important for citizens in a democracy, especially a networked one.

Our economic, political and social future lies not in working hard but in choosing to do the hard work. Seth Godin describes the latter as:

It’s hard work to make difficult emotional decisions, such as quitting a job and setting out on your own. It’s hard work to invent a new system, service, or process that’s remarkable. It’s hard work to tell your boss that he’s being intellectually and emotionally lazy. It’s easier to stand by and watch the company fade into oblivion. It’s hard work to tell senior management to abandon something that it has been doing for a long time in favor of a new and apparently risky alternative. It’s hard work to make good decisions with less than all of the data.

Anyone can work hard, but it takes courage to take on the hard work of changing our communities, questioning the education system or creating a non-profit organisation with no guaranteed return on investment. Hard work is not about literacy, numeracy or even civics. Hard work is questioning underlying assumptions and seeing new patterns and then taking action on this knowledge. Critical thinking is not only hard work, but it’s difficult to teach and not easy to measure. No wonder schools avoid it.

To face the environmental, social, political and economic challenges of our tightly coupled global world, we’ll all need to do some very hard work. Are our schools helping to prepare students for this? Do our workplaces encourage hard work? Do our communities support those who choose to do the hard work, especially challenging the status quo?

What hard work are you doing?

Local voices in education

The Minister of Education for the Province of New Brunswick will be meeting with people in our area on the topic of “Building an Educated Workforce for New Brunswick”. I’ve been thinking about this for the past few days and trying to collect my thoughts on public education. First of all, I’m not keen on the Minister’s chosen topic, because we need to focus on more than just an educated workforce, we need an educated and informed citizenry. That said, here are some threads I want to weave together and would appreciate advice on this, as I doubt that I’ll get more than five minutes to either ask a question or make a point.

Sense of Urgency: Rob Paterson made an excellent initial foray into recommendations for education on PEI and this comment resonates with me as well:

By 2015 over 50% of Islanders will be over 50. By 2030 50% will be over 65. We know for sure that every child will be precious and that we have to have as many young as possible who can be both good citizens and flexible. They don’t have to all be PHD’s – they have to be net contributors – they have to be like their great grandparents who also had to cope with a lot of change.

We have to ask a big question first. What kind of person needs to emerge from our school system that will enable us to get through the crisis of – the end of cheap oil, the end of commodity agriculture, climate change, a health care cost crisis, a world torn by conflict over religion, oil and water?

What is the product of our existing approach? Is it that most of kids will be able to cope or not?

The Technology Battles: Sheryl Nussbaum-Beach shows how disconnected our schools are from the reality of the Internet Age:

We have a generation of students arriving in our classrooms that are more and more comfortable with technology, in fact, more comfortable than we will ever be. And that makes many of us very uncomfortable, so uncomfortable that we react with banning and filtering rather than modeling how to connect with content experts and teaching responsible net citizenship.

From the Trenches: The resident experts on public education in our home, both teenagers, gave two pieces of advice for the Minister. One said to get rid of homework; “I actually like going to school, but the homework on top of classes is what ruins it”. The other just wants to have motivated teachers.

My own sense is that the current education system will remain as it is for the next decade at least, unless there is such failure that new approaches, such as abolishing schools, will be attempted. We are stuck with the current system, and many vested interests such as unions, administrators, bus services and dual-income families do not want to see major systemic changes. That said, I feel that a pragmatic approach, without destroying the school system, would be to allow for experimentation. Let motivated teachers, parents, businesses and non-profits get together and create options. The Minister needs to foster a climate of decentralized experimentation. Options include the International Baccalaureate program or cooperative training and education with the local community.

The great weakness of this industrial education system is that it is a monoculture, based on a standard curriculum, and like an agricultural monoculture is more susceptible to disease and rot. To prepare for a climate, society and economy that none of us can predict with certainty, we need diversity in our thinking and in our skills. No single system or approach can do that.

Learning Technologies Bootcamp

Janet Clarey and I will be facilitating a Bootcamp on Learning Technologies at the Brandon Hall Innovations in Learning Conference on 24 September. If you’re planning on attending the conference in Santa Clara (24-26 Sept), there’s still some room for this pre-conference session.

On a more social note, I haven’t heard about any beer tastings at this event, but there is a wine tasting on the last day. I’ll be arriving on the Saturday before the conference if anyone wants to get together. I think that this is going to be a lot of fun and it will be great to connect with the bloggers whom I’ve seen on the presenters list.