A new threat for our universities?

From Daniel Lemire is this news from the Guardian (is it news to our academic institutions?) that China is looking at becoming an exporter of degrees, attracting students to study in China where it will be cheaper than here. Today, many Western universities are exporters of degrees to Asian students. One strategy of traditional universities is to create online degree programs. Daniel makes a couple of conclusions about this tactic:

However, before online degrees become a distinct exportable good, you need to have your local students freely choosing the web instead of the classroom. Asians are not going to buy degrees your local population doesn’t value dearly.
I really think China can reverse its status as far as education goes, and by doing so, hurt badly Western Universities in the long run. I don’t think online degrees are going to be a viable escape for Western Universities. If China goes ahead with its plans to become an education provider, it will hurt, no matter what!

I’m sure that there will be a growing demand for online degrees, it’s just that a cheaper alternative may make for a more competitive marketplace.

As if changing demographics weren’t enough of a challenge, now it seems that China will be taking some of the international students that our universities are starting to depend upon for sustainable revenue. The world is flattening and direct competitors are now half way around the world. I wonder if our boys will go to university in China and learn Mandarin at the same time.

Copyright – a model for a previous era?

I’ve been reading the OpenBusiness blog for a while, trying to get a handle on copyright, which I’ve previously described as being important for our society and our economy. This article, via OpenBusiness, in The Times, is a good start in describing the big issues:

Economists tell us that, as the marginal costs of reproduction shrink, so should unit value. People still want physical books, but the only reason to restrict the digital reproduction of music and film today is to support artists, or — more to the point — to make money. The attempt to use restricted access as a business model in the face of this gigantic change seems not only unethical, but increasingly impractical.

So we need to examine new models for funding creative works — to address the question of how cultural producers will survive under the new paradigm. New approaches to copyright and reproduction are not just necessary, but inevitable. Copyright — the right of a creator to control the reproduction of a work and to sell this control to others — is a legal device that was designed for an earlier social/technological moment.

Life as a Free Agent

I read Dan Pink’s Free Agent Nation just before I started working for myself and would recommend it to anyone else looking at making the leap to freelancing.

After almost three years, here’s a partial list of what being a free agent means to me:

10. Doing my own tech support

9. Only working seven days a week

8. Paying cash & avoiding monthly payments

7. Time for exercise and reading

6. Lots of short breaks, but no long holidays

5. Getting asked to volunteer more

4. Seeing more of my banker

3. Seeing more of my family

2. Looking forward to Mondays

1. Creating my own opportunities

Aliant Highspeed and NetAssistant

About six months ago I wrote about the difference between advertised and actual Internet connection speeds from my service provider, Aliant (a Bell Canada company). This post gets quite a few hits so I checked the links to make sure that they’re up to date.

I found that Aliant’s speed check is no longer web-based and now requires a 9MB download of a program (motivesb.exe). I haven’t downloaded this software, which might slow down my computer, and I’m wondering if this is as benign as Aliant says on their website:>

Net Assistant* is a FREE service that delivers leading edge self-healing tools directly to your desk top. These tools automatically detect possible issues on your computer that may cause problems accessing the Internet, sending/receiving emails or browsing Web sites, and enables you to fix them easily.

UK ‘s JISC Recommends Open Source in Higher Education

The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC), which represents higher education institutions in the UK, has released a briefing paper that strongly supports open source software for education. JISC’s Development Director stated:

JISC sees open source software as an important component in developing a sustainable ICT infrastructure for UK higher and further education. This briefing paper sets out JISC’s position clearly, providing institutions with the information they need to make informed choices. JISC also emphasizes the separate but complementary role of open standards which is key to enabling institutions to integrate both open source and commercial products in their ICT infrastructure according to their priorities, needs and available budgets.

Canada does not appear to have a similar type of organisation and so it seems that we will go on spending more money on technology and less on learning.

Jury Duty 2006

Just received a summons for jury duty today. Not sure if I should be pleased to be doing my civic duty or perturbed that I’m going to be missing five days of work. I’m not a dentist, lawyer, veterinarian etc., so I’m not officially ineligible to serve as a juror. As a self-employed consultant, five days of lost productivity is significant. Maybe it’ll just mean working on my business at night, unless we’re sequestered in some motel where I’m not allowed Internet access. But then, as Admiral Nelson once said [which I had to memorise], “Duty is the great business of a sea-officer; all private considerations must give way to it, however painful it may be.” And it will be painful, as jurors are only compensated $40 per day of duty, less than a teenager flipping burgers.

The summons has raised some issues that I never really gave much time to consider. Why is a dentist ineligible to serve, when most people have a choice of dentists and one dentist being out of the office would not create significant harm to society? The same goes for doctors and veterinarians. I can understand a busy surgeon being exempt, but what about the family practitioner whose office is only open two or three days a week? I also consider my own work history. During my 21 years of active military service I was exempt from jury duty. Other than those periods when I was deployed, I could easily have taken off a week without degrading the operational capacity of the armed forces. There are many desk-bound military personnel who could do the same.

I’m wondering if our justice system needs to get out of the industrial era, “one size fits all”, approach to jury duty. Wouldn’t it make more sense not to provide blanket exemptions for professions, other than those in the justice system itself? I also feel that the $40 per day allowance is a visable indicator of how little our government values jury duty.

Quotable Comments on Learning

Here is a random selection of some quotes that I’ve been collecting. This collection is one example of why I focus my efforts on informal learning rather than more formalised education.

“… curriculum is a solution to a problem we created.” —Brian Alger

“No generation in history has ever been so thoroughly prepared for the industrial age.” —David Warlick

“The claim is that if educators invested a fraction of the energy on stimulating the students’ enjoyment of learning that they now spend in trying to transmit information we could achieve much better results.” —Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi

“I never teach my pupils; I only attempt to provide the conditions in which they can learn.” —Albert Einstein

“Play is ever more important to skill development and professional competence. Yet our schools do not tolerate, much less teach, play.” —Nine Shift

“After a long life, and thirty years in the public school trenches, I’ve concluded that genius is as common as dirt. We suppress our genius only because we haven’t yet figured out how to manage a population of educated men and women. The solution, I think, is simple and glorious. Let them manage themselves.” —John Taylor Gatto

Training: A Solution Looking for a Problem

While listening to the radio the other day, the person being interviewed spoke about the need for training for those responsible for ensuring clean water in many remote Canadian communities. Now, I’m not going to say that training is not required, but making the leap from a performance issue (lack of skills, abilities, knowledge; lack of access to appropriate data and resources; etc) directly to training as the only solution, is the wrong approach and the most costly. As a taxpayer, I don’t want government to slap training band-aids on any problem that involves work performance. Some barriers to performance that are often overlooked when prescribing training include:

  • Unclear expectations (such as policies & guidelines);
  • Inadequate resources;
  • Unclear performance measures;
  • Rewards and consequences not directly linked to the desired performance.

In some cases, these barriers could be addressed and there would be no further requirement for training. Where there is a genuine lack of skills and knowledge, training may be required, but it should only be in cases where the other barriers to performance have been addressed. A trained worker, without the right resources and with unclear expectations, will still not perform up to the desired standard, and the drinking water supply may still be in danger.

I have noticed that many large organisations have this tendency to slap on the training band-aid once any issue has been labelled a human performance issue. Training that is not directly related to performance wastes time, bores workers and costs money. Here is a general diagram of the high level process of performance analysis. These posts, and the diagrams, are Creative Commons licensed, so go ahead and use them. You might even save some money.

performance analysis process by Robert Mager

Dave’s Social Media Project

Dave Cormier has started a wiki with the provisional title; The Best Damn New Media Curriculum Evah! Plan. The idea is to get a number of thinkers and workers together to build something (a course?) that will support and encourage learning activities on the Web. I’ve volunteered to get involved and we’ll see where this all goes.

I like the idea of a collaborative curriculum, but I have some concerns about the restrictive aspects of curriculum, as has been brilliantly described by Brian Alger. My own focus will be to try to develop some artifacts that could be used by others to support learning in an inter-networked world. Nothing ventured, nothing gained; so it’s time to stick out our necks and create something new. Check it out and join us.

2nd Anniversary

Many bloggers reflected on what they had learned on the arrival of the new year. I’m doing it now because 1) I have some time as I sit in a Montreal hotel hoping that the freezing rain won’t cancel my flight home and 2) the second anniversary of this blog is on Sunday, the 19th, but I’d rather not turn on my computer this weekend, after two weeks away from home.

On reflection, I can confirm how powerful informal learning is becoming, in a ubiquitously connected & pervasively proximate, world. Many people are using their expanded networks to learn and collaborate. On the other side, there is still a large segment of the population trapped in hierarchial organisations where information, knowledge and decisions trickle through layers of filtration. I’ve also realised that the digital divide, or digital immigrants vs digital natives, is not generational, it is attitudinal. As a baby boomer, I thought that my generation was way behind younger generations. However, I have met many university-educated people, 20 years younger than me who don’t have a clue about the basic operations of computers and the Internet. Even school-age children don’t have basic information search capabilities, and many do not understand how to evaluate a source of information. We have a long way to go in becoming a society of autonomous knowledge workers.

On a positive note, I’m excited about being part of Education Bridges and I’ve seen some real progress in extending our research and education network at the Atlantic Wildlife Institute, where I volunteer as the Director of Education. These grassroots projects are stimulating, even though they don’t pay the bills.

I’m also finding that this year I have not had to go out and market my services. All of my projects to date have been referrals and I believe that this is partly due to my blog. I continue to promote blogging for free-agents, and those considering going out on their own, as the most effective marketing tool there is.

So I guess it’s one more year of interesting conversations for me …