As I said earlier this week:
It seems that this is already happening, according to this post from Daniel Lemire, on the lack of jobs for computer science graduates:
Work is learning. Learning is the work.
business & working
As I said earlier this week:
It seems that this is already happening, according to this post from Daniel Lemire, on the lack of jobs for computer science graduates:
Following up on last week’s post on PulseLearning, it seems than another Fredericton company is hiring – Isomni Solutions. The word is that they’re looking for an instructional designer, two business analysts (with over 10 years experience) as well as a passel of .NET programmers. From their website, Isomni states that they are focused on eHealth and portal development, amongst other areas.
I listened to a report on the radio this morning about presenteeism, defined as “the practice of always being present at the workplace, often working longer hours even when there is nothing to do.” Once again, there seemed to be a focus on how to deal with the individual who has a problem, or the manager who cannot manage his or her workers. Little was said about systemic issues, such as the hierarchy that exists in most workplaces that forces many people to comply and park their brains at the door.
I previously quoted a fellow performance improvement practitoner, Klaus Wittkuhn, on the importance of initial work system design:
It is not an intelligent strategy to train people to overcome system deficiencies. Instead, we should design the system properly to make sure that the performers can leverage all their capabilities.
One of the models that I use is based on Mager & Pipe’s classic reference book, Analysing Performance Problems, which provides a step by step approach to finding out what the real work performance issue is, and how to deal with it. Based on this book, I have developed my own graphic, which shows some of the basic steps that you can take before jumping to conclusions on how to deal with problems like presenteeism.
Seth Godin marketing and branding guru, and author of Purple Cow, latest post is on how the importance of the Internet is only beginning to be felt. For instance:
For those in the elearning or social networking business, this is a very important fact. It may mean that business models that failed 5-10 years ago, could work now. Time to clean out that closet of ideas.
I would infer that as cheap and easy Internet tools proliferate, those with specialised skills in coding, etc, may begin to lose their market worth – unless they also have the skills of inventiveness, empathy and meaning that Daniel Pink believes will be necessary for future employability.
Godfrey Parkin has an excellent post on what is really happening in the global economy; namely that multinationals will follow the money. The next century is looking like it will be the Chinese century.
In Canada, we continue to focus almost exclusively on exporting to the US. As Godfrey puts it, Wal*Mart does more business with China than all of Canada does. The business development strategies that I see presented at every “innovation” forum in the region have the same old story presented by analysts, bureaucrats and government. That story is about exporting our products and services to the US. The talk about diversified global markets is negligible. Given the warning signals on the state of the US economy, it would make sense not to put all of our economic eggs in one basket, n’est-ce pas?
Well, this is news to me, but I’m probably way behind on the local gossip.
It appears that the Irish elearning company, PulseLearning has opened an office in Fredericton, NB. The company focuses on compliance training, which seems like a sustainable business model, as the creation of new rules and regulations is not likely to end soon. PulseLearning is currently hiring project managers and instructional designers, and they join a number of established elearning companies in Fredericton, making for good job prospects in the capital city.
In 1999 we had the Cluetrain Manifesto, with its 95 theses à la Gutenberg; the first ten being:
Many business executives do not realise the underlying reason of the Cluetrain Manifesto, and continue to build defensive walls between the company and their customers. They even use military terminology when referring to their markets. Get real folks, the customer is your lifeblood, and now has the tools to figure things out with or without you. Take thesis 7 – today we have more than just hyperlinks; we have peer-to-peer and Voice over IP to connect with anyone, anytime. Jon Husband, with his Wirearchy perspective, has developed his own 2005 manifesto on a similar theme [updated link]:
Here are some ways that I can think of to develop a new company, based on Jon’s principles. You see, I always have to make things concrete – it’s in my nature ;-)
Please feel free to add your own …
I attended the ITANS CEO Boot Camp in Halifax yesterday. It was geared to small & medium sized businesses in the IT sector. There were a few of us from New Brunswick as well as at least one person from Newfoundland in attendance. I decided to attend because of the great price – $75 and the presentation on e-Health in afternoon.
The morning started with a presentation from Michael O’Neil, Managing Director of IDC Canada. He talked about the various definitions of innovation and commercialisation, stating that commmercialisation should be the focus of any IT firm. I think that this is just quibbling over definitions. Many definitions of innovation include wealth creation. For an excellent, and non-mainstream, read on innovation and its underlying principles, read Dave Pollard’s 30 page – A Prescription for Business Innovation (2004) instead.
What I found the most useful part Michael’s presentation was his description of the typical growth curve of a company and how a company needs different kinds of partners, depending on where it is in its growth. For instance in the initial stage, IT product companies need sales partners, usually hired at great expense, to get those first product sales. In Stage 2, companies need services partners, with existing relationships in vertical markets, who can refer their products. Later, in Stage 3, companies need logistics partners, to smoothly handle customer service. Finally, in Stage 4, companies need to find hyper-efficient channel partners, such as Dell is for the computer hardware industry.
Michael also likened the typical IT company’s perspective toward its customers as wearing your suit jacket inside-out. Only the company can see the nice, finished fabric. He said that vendors have to stop considering themselves as the centre of their solar system, and put their customers at the centre. His presentation was then followed by two IT company representatives who rarely mentioned their customers, and one talked about the need to get the "message to the market" correct. An inside-out approach, I would say.
For small companies, there were a few more nuggets of wisdom during the morning, but you had to dig hard to find them. Many of the models shown would have worked well during the dot com bubble, but I’m not sure how well they will work today for a start-up tech company. For now, I’m sticking with Dave Pollard and his work on Natural Enterprises and Clayton Christensen’s theories on innovation.
David Williamson Shaffer’s paper on Pedagogical Praxis: The professions as models for post-industrial education provides a theoretical model, with case studies, on how educational institutions can better bridge the gap between learning in formal education and learning in the workplace. These three studies show how relatively easy it is to ground a learning program in a post-industrial workplace context, by using what are today quite cheap and accesible technologies.
These case studies include students working as biomedical negotiators, online journalists and architects using complex mathematics. These three stories make this academic paper a delight to read.
For a more academic review, see this eLearning Review.
Update: Link fixed :-)
Just before I stepped out on my own, I read Daniel Pink’s Free Agent Nation, which I would recommend to every freelancer. The CS Monitor has recently featured Pink in an article on the end of jobs. Pink sees another shift in the employment market, speculating that off-shoring is going to continue, and that “There are going to be plenty of opportunities…. But it’s not going to be ‘knowledge workers,’ it’s going to be creators and empathizers.” His new book, A Whole New Mind, is based on this idea:
I take this to mean that synthesis and conceptual thinking will be in high demand, as businesses and organisations keep up with technology, market and cultural changes. Seeing patterns will be necessary. If this is the case, then Dave Pollard’s critical life skills will be essential for more and more people [take the hint, educators].
Pink’s first book was based on many interviews with free agents across the US, and I hope that this next one will have good data to back it up. The book is due out in March 2005.