New Brunswick’s Education Plan

nb-flag.gif

Over 50 of us had dinner with the Minister of Education on Friday night. I wasn’t sure what to expect, and as many of you know, I’m highly critical of industrial education. After the speech, I didn’t have much to disagree with. If this government follows through on its vision and promises, then we may see some real changes that will help our children become active and contributing citizens.

Kelly Lamrock spoke about community schooling, local learning options, an innovation fund and co-op programs. He challenged local business and non-profit groups to get involved with their schools. I have accepted this challenge, and it helped that two school principals were sitting at my table. We will discuss how we can integrate the Atlantic Wildlife Institute into the curriculum and also how I can help teachers understand Web tools for learning. There is a real atmosphere of openness, that I have not sensed for the past decade.

From the government document, When Kids Come First:

In the world that awaits, one of the skills most in demand will be the ability to solve problems. Following instructions will be work done in low-wage economies, or by machines. The people who control their economic future will be the kids who went through school solving problems and challenging themselves, not just following instructions.

And in that global world that awaits, our children will actually need a stronger sense of community than ever before. We’re not training — “we are teaching citizens, parents and leaders. That means we need to make our children feel anchored in a community where their actions touch the lives of others, where we give them a sense of our history, culture, languages and values — and a sense of belonging here at home.

I’m impressed with the government’s vision, knowing the challenges of changing a system that has been chugging along just fine for a century. I also know that all of us will have to get involved now, so that we don’t lose momentum. Many people will be threatened by changes to a more flexible and transparent learning environment, and at the first sign of difficulties reactionary forces will try to move back the clock. Carpe diem, New Brunswick.

Personal Environments

[This is very much a work in progress]

David Dalgado has put up a graphic of his personal learning environment, using categories of Main Tool, Browser, LMS, News, Search, Communication, Knowledge base, Social Networks and Web Apps. When I examined my Web tools at the time, I came up with Main Professional Site, Information Management, Productivity Tools and Social Networks. This view was a bit different from my Personal Knowledge Management system, last year. This process consisted of Pulling, Sorting, Categorizing, Reflecting & Commenting, and Finding. In all of these cases, the individual decides what to connect to, choosing the intensity of the bonds with people or information.

Whichever view you consider, there are multiple aspects of personal learning and sense-making, enough to fill several books (or one big wiki). These new tools on the Web are making it easier to cobble together something that works for each of us. Jane Hart’s Top 100 list, shows the wide variety of tools available.

Connections, enabled by these tools, are starting to matter more in our work and our learning. We can connect with work, love, entertainment and meaning online. That’s why I’m to trying to find patterns in how these personal spaces have been created.

Mark Federman’s Valence Theory of Organization provides a most interesting lens to view our connections and I look forward to his future publications.

I identify several specific forms of valence relationships that are enacted by two or more people when they come together to do almost anything; these are economic, social-psychological, identity, knowledge, and ecological. An organization is thus defined as that complex, emergent entity which occurs when two or more people, or two or more organizations, or both, share multiple valences at various strengths, with various pervasiveness, among the component elements. Using this as a definition of organization has profoundly disruptive implications for every aspect of management, governance, and engagement that we have come to know over the last hundred or so years.

If individuals have stronger learning bonds outside school than inside, what happens to education? If there are stronger economic bonds through your network than your current job, what happens to the industrial workplace?

valences.jpg

As we are able to connect to anyone at any time, as well as have access to information as we need it, the organisation of the past century is starting to look like a hollow shell.

valences2.jpg

Doing time in high school

The Milgram Experiments demonstrated that normal people can easily do nasty things to other people if an expert tells them what to do. The Stanford Prison Experiment showed that normal people act like sadistic guards when placed in a “prison-like” environment. Today, in New Brunswick, we are making our schools more like prisons. Video surveillance cameras will be installed in all high schools in School District 2.

Of course, we have been assured that the cameras will only be used ethically and in the best interests of the students; but power corrupts. No public consultations preceded this decision. Video surveillance is one more control tool to be used “against” students, without their consent. Treat people like prisoners and sure as anything, they will start to act like prisoners.

Alternatives to technologies of control are available, cheaper and more ethical. First, build smaller schools, where everyone can feel at home. The maximum number of students per school should be 150 [Dunbar’s number]. Getting all teachers out of the staff room and into the halls, interacting with students, might put a more human face on the institution as well. Give students increasing amounts of control so that by Grade 12 they are able to make their own decisions about curriculum, homework, study time, etc. The more control you have, the less you feel like a prisoner, isn’t that correct, Employee #12 in Cubicle Zone D?

It seems as if our education system is trying as hard as possible to disempower and alienate an entire generation.

INATT

Jay Cross is working on a research paper, which if it turns into a book, he will name it INATT (it’s not about the technology).

  • Blogging isn’t about the technology, it’s about easily publishing your thoughts and allowing others to join in and add to them.
  • Wikis aren’t about the technology, they’re an easy way for everyone to write, edit and comment on the same space and not worry about operating systems or word processor document formats.
  • RSS isn’t about the technology, it’s about having one place to watch the multi-person, multi-channel, multi-perspective Web universe.
  • Podcasts aren’t about the technology, they’re a way to share your voice and let others listen on their own terms and on their own time.
  • Multi-player roleplay games aren’t about the technology, they’re about immersing yourself in another world and learning things you might not in real life.

Many people cannot use these practical tools in school or at work. If it’s not about the technology, why are we letting IT departments decide what’s best for us?

Hard Work

Graham commented on my back to school post, “Screw literacy, it’s thinking that’s died“, and I replied that I would rather work with a thinking illiterate partner than an unthinking literate one. Literacy and numeracy are great skills and may make for a productive workforce but critical thinking (questioning all assumptions, as well as your own) is much more important for citizens in a democracy, especially a networked one.

Our economic, political and social future lies not in working hard but in choosing to do the hard work. Seth Godin describes the latter as:

It’s hard work to make difficult emotional decisions, such as quitting a job and setting out on your own. It’s hard work to invent a new system, service, or process that’s remarkable. It’s hard work to tell your boss that he’s being intellectually and emotionally lazy. It’s easier to stand by and watch the company fade into oblivion. It’s hard work to tell senior management to abandon something that it has been doing for a long time in favor of a new and apparently risky alternative. It’s hard work to make good decisions with less than all of the data.

Anyone can work hard, but it takes courage to take on the hard work of changing our communities, questioning the education system or creating a non-profit organisation with no guaranteed return on investment. Hard work is not about literacy, numeracy or even civics. Hard work is questioning underlying assumptions and seeing new patterns and then taking action on this knowledge. Critical thinking is not only hard work, but it’s difficult to teach and not easy to measure. No wonder schools avoid it.

To face the environmental, social, political and economic challenges of our tightly coupled global world, we’ll all need to do some very hard work. Are our schools helping to prepare students for this? Do our workplaces encourage hard work? Do our communities support those who choose to do the hard work, especially challenging the status quo?

What hard work are you doing?

Local voices in education

The Minister of Education for the Province of New Brunswick will be meeting with people in our area on the topic of “Building an Educated Workforce for New Brunswick”. I’ve been thinking about this for the past few days and trying to collect my thoughts on public education. First of all, I’m not keen on the Minister’s chosen topic, because we need to focus on more than just an educated workforce, we need an educated and informed citizenry. That said, here are some threads I want to weave together and would appreciate advice on this, as I doubt that I’ll get more than five minutes to either ask a question or make a point.

Sense of Urgency: Rob Paterson made an excellent initial foray into recommendations for education on PEI and this comment resonates with me as well:

By 2015 over 50% of Islanders will be over 50. By 2030 50% will be over 65. We know for sure that every child will be precious and that we have to have as many young as possible who can be both good citizens and flexible. They don’t have to all be PHD’s – they have to be net contributors – they have to be like their great grandparents who also had to cope with a lot of change.

We have to ask a big question first. What kind of person needs to emerge from our school system that will enable us to get through the crisis of – the end of cheap oil, the end of commodity agriculture, climate change, a health care cost crisis, a world torn by conflict over religion, oil and water?

What is the product of our existing approach? Is it that most of kids will be able to cope or not?

The Technology Battles: Sheryl Nussbaum-Beach shows how disconnected our schools are from the reality of the Internet Age:

We have a generation of students arriving in our classrooms that are more and more comfortable with technology, in fact, more comfortable than we will ever be. And that makes many of us very uncomfortable, so uncomfortable that we react with banning and filtering rather than modeling how to connect with content experts and teaching responsible net citizenship.

From the Trenches: The resident experts on public education in our home, both teenagers, gave two pieces of advice for the Minister. One said to get rid of homework; “I actually like going to school, but the homework on top of classes is what ruins it”. The other just wants to have motivated teachers.

My own sense is that the current education system will remain as it is for the next decade at least, unless there is such failure that new approaches, such as abolishing schools, will be attempted. We are stuck with the current system, and many vested interests such as unions, administrators, bus services and dual-income families do not want to see major systemic changes. That said, I feel that a pragmatic approach, without destroying the school system, would be to allow for experimentation. Let motivated teachers, parents, businesses and non-profits get together and create options. The Minister needs to foster a climate of decentralized experimentation. Options include the International Baccalaureate program or cooperative training and education with the local community.

The great weakness of this industrial education system is that it is a monoculture, based on a standard curriculum, and like an agricultural monoculture is more susceptible to disease and rot. To prepare for a climate, society and economy that none of us can predict with certainty, we need diversity in our thinking and in our skills. No single system or approach can do that.

Learning Technologies Bootcamp

Janet Clarey and I will be facilitating a Bootcamp on Learning Technologies at the Brandon Hall Innovations in Learning Conference on 24 September. If you’re planning on attending the conference in Santa Clara (24-26 Sept), there’s still some room for this pre-conference session.

On a more social note, I haven’t heard about any beer tastings at this event, but there is a wine tasting on the last day. I’ll be arriving on the Saturday before the conference if anyone wants to get together. I think that this is going to be a lot of fun and it will be great to connect with the bloggers whom I’ve seen on the presenters list.

The Community Gold Rush

Social Networks have become quite popular on the Web, with services such as MySpace and Facebook commanding billions of investment dollars. Social Networks are the new public spaces, though they’re no longer owned by the government. We’re moving from the town square to the online community. What makes online public spaces different from physical ones is that in the online world what you say will remain there for a long time; the conversations are searchable and can be be copied; and we may never know who has viewed what we have said or written. Each of these facets can be seen in a positive or a negative light, depending upon your perspective.

With the huge rise in popularity of Facebook, we are beginning to see a backlash on the social networking system, that tends to mundane and frivolous aspects of our lives. Facebook and MySpace have been banned for public employees in the US, Canada and Australia, as well as in many schools. While it is true that Facebook conversations seem to be primarily focused on friends and family, business uses are on the upswing. Facebook is becoming a business platform that allows workers to let their friends know who they work for and maybe what they’re selling, so companies can leverage this as a viral marketing tool.

One of the limitations of Facebook is that the data are stored on someone else’s server, and the rules can change without notice. Skype, a free voice over IP service, had a recent outage for several days, leaving millions of users without communications. Depending on these free services for business may not be a wise decision and at this time it may be best to use web-based services in addition to other communication and networking tools. Another option would be to build your own service.

In contrast to the casual and chatty tone of Facebook, some niche business social networks are starting to mark out their own, but smaller, territory online. These include Sermo for physicians; E-Factor for European entrepreneurs and Emerald InTouch which supports collaboration for researchers subscribing to Emerald’s professional journals.

The Emerald service is built upon Elgg, an open source platform developed and serviced by Curverider of the UK. Emerald has taken the free software construction code of Elgg and created a niche network focused on research, extending Emerald’s basic offering of online journals.

Given the backlash against social networks once they reach a certain level of success, businesses may opt for smaller, controlled gateways to further online social networking. Since networking has always been an important aspect of business, it’s doubtful that these tools will be ignored by the majority of businesses. The trick will be to remain as open as possible to attract members, allow users to control who and what they connect with and offer a valid business reason to remain a member and invite others.

The competition to become the prime community for your niche market may be heating up and we may see another Internet real estate gold rush, as in the first Dot Com era.

Opting-in

Now that we’re inundated with information, e-mail and invitations to the next great Web 2.0 thing, pull is looking a lot better than push. Pull means that the individual decides what to read or who to talk to. I wrote about this earlier, in Please don’t push my learning.

One reason that I have been such a fan of Elgg is that this open source, social learning platform has at its core the concept that the individual has to decide to opt in, whether it be to connect with an instructor, a learner, a community or a group. According to Time, the growth of Facebook is due to its basic premise of opting in:

Maybe that’s why Facebook’s fastest-growing demographic consists of people 35 or older: they’re refugees from the uncouth wider Web. Every community must negotiate the imperatives of individual freedom and collective social order, and Facebook constitutes a critical rebalancing of the Internet’s founding vision of unfettered electronic liberty. Of course, it is possible to misbehave on Facebook–it’s just self-defeating. Unlike the Internet, Facebook is structured around an opt-in philosophy; people have to consent to have contact with or even see others on the network. If you’re annoying folks, you’ll essentially cease to exist, as those you annoy drop you off the grid.

The huge success of Facebook may be an indicator that it’s time to reconsider push business models, push marketing and even push learning.

Carnival of Nonprofit Consultants

npcarnival.gif

This is my first turn to host the Carnival of Nonprofit Consultants. I tried to focus on environmental themes, and I got a couple, but most importantly, all of these blogs come to you from Canada.

  1. First off is Robert Paterson of Prince Edward Island. Rob has been involved in many nonprofit organisations, from helping to create the Queen Street Commons to his work with National Public Radio. There’s a lot to pick from, but I would recommend his recent post on the Food Trust of PEI, which is focused on informing consumers of food what it is that they’re really eating.
  2. Next is Dave Pollard of How to Save the World. Dave’s posts usually address some deep subjects and there’s a wealth of practical information too. His recent post on the Essential Capacities for Communities is worth a read for any nonprofit consultant.
  3. Chris Corrigan from the west coast is quite experienced with open space technology and this week talks about More on Presence, Circles and Granola.
  4. Another west coaster, Jon Husband, shares his experience at Wirearchy. Read Jon’s recent post on how games are becoming mainstream workplace learning fare, at Playing Games at Work.
  5. Joan Vinall-Cox works in higher education and seems to be a natural blogger. Check out her Top Ten Tools for work and learning.
  6. Dave Cormier is currently working at the University of PEI and also co-founded Worldbridges, a unique nonprofit business. Dave recently posted An Introduction to my blog – Two years in review.
  7. I would be remiss if I didn’t include the photo blog created by one of our summer students at the Atlantic Wildlife Institute. Mark has just finished his term but I hope to continue to post some photos during the year, in my capacity as Director of Education. There are great photos and explanations about a wide variety of North American wildlife.

cnpc-cdn.jpg

 

Keep track of the Carnival of Nonprofit Consultants, no matter which blog is hosting, by subscribing to the Carnival feed.