Teaching Defiance

I had the opportunity to listen to Anne Bartlett-Bragg’s podcast with Mike Newman, author of Teaching Defiance, while traveling last week. This cover note is what caught my attention:

This is a book about choice. It urges activist educators to help people break free from their pasts, take control of the present, and make deliberate, defiant choices about their futures. A true polemic, Teaching Defiance offers an exciting antidote to some of the formulaic writing in the fields of adult education, organizational learning, and human resource development.

Teaching Defiance sounds like the perfect book for any learning revolutionary. I made some notes while listening to the podcast and saw a clear linkage between critical theory and informal learning. Newman discusses three steps in the learning/teaching process. The first is Rational Discourse, which seems similar to traditional teaching. Here you get the facts and establish some common understanding. The second is Non-rational Discourse where learners gain non-teachable insight through various methods such as play or metaphor. The last step is Choose Action Well. This is where the learner exchanges stories and finds other people. I would also call this seeking meaningful conversations or networked learning. You have to seek out those who might shake your cognitive tree a bit, but you need a moral or philosphical framework from which to decide who you seek to converse with. Critical theory requires that you constantly question authority, including your own.

I have yet to pick up the book, but it’s on my list and I look forward to reading it. So far, there are no reader reviews on Amazon or Wiley.

By the way, I made these notes on my Moleskine notebook while on the plane.

Making sense of the Web

How do most people keep track of the growing amount of information that they receive? I’ve developed a personal knowledge management system, that works for me (for now, though it needs an overhaul). Managing information and keeping track of everything was a topic of conversation when four (now five) bloggers enjoyed a beer tasting and dinner in Las Vegas last week. Tony Karrer wondered if I found my Moleskine of any use, since he prefers entering notes straight to the computer. Since I type so slowly & poorly, a notebook makes more sense for me, and it’s quite portable. I admit that transcribing creates an extra step.

There was little doubt that two tools are critical in managing the information flow of the Internet Age – RSS aggregators to track blogs & news; and tagging to keep track of interesting things you find on the Net. I, for one, regularly search my tagged items and find this online database more flexible than browser-based Bookmarks or Favourites. Tagging is growing in popularity, as a recent PEW report shows that 28% of people on the Internet have tagged or categorized content.

Also, I think that there was general consensus amongst us that our blogs were great tools to help us make sense of all of this information, through writing and conversation online. Blogs give you a permanent location for your conversations and connecting with others. A blog can also be an online business card and introduction service.

Though blogs may not be for everyone, I would recommend, as a minimum, getting started with an aggregator and tagging (aka social bookmarking). These are the basic tools for self-directed learning on the Web, suitable for students, teachers, trainers, professionals and life-long learners.

Draw your ideal library

Our local public library and the advanced methods class from Mount Allison University are circulating a paper requesting input on how to make our town library better.

What would you like your new Sackville Public Library to like inside and out?

On a piece of white paper ranging in size from 4″ x 6″ to 11″ x 17″ draw your ideal library. You can use any medium (crayon, marker, paint, etc.) Remember to be creative and original. If possible, please provide a brief explanation of your drawing.

I’m not crazy about the format or the limitations given, but I know that there are a lot of good ideas about libraries, library 2.0, etc. floating on the Net. I also know that some great designers and innovative librarians visit this site from time to time, including; Joyce Valenza; Christian Long; Ryan Deschamps; and maybe even Jenny, The Shifted Librarian (I read her blog).

I have some ideas, but it’s not really my field of knowledge or experience, so are there any great ideas that you’re willing to share?

Update: I’ve created a Library 2.0 tag to bookmark web sites related to new perspectives on libraries in the 21st Century.

New Personal Creativity Management Device Launches

Local company, Sackville Industries, has just launched a revolutionary personal creativity management device that may herald a new era in information technology. Podcasts are so “last week” when you can have the i-Think (patent pending). Graham Watt, President & CEO of Sackville Industries says that this product has been years in the making and has undergone extensive R&D and user testing. “This will make the iPod look like a rounding error”, he said at the product launch, held this morning at The Bridge Street Café in downtown Sackville, New Brunswick.

Here is a sample of the product information, currently available:

i-think
USER’S MANUAL

Directions:
Put i-think’s ear phones in place.
Fondle button.
Think.

Important:
Batteries not included because there’s nowhere to put them.
Ask about our comprehensive lifetime warranty plan.
If button falls off, glue it back on.
Not responsible for depth or quality of thinking.
If voices heard on earphones see clinical psychiatrist.

Accessories:
Genuine imitation moose nostril hide i-think holster
with belt clip available on special request: $2300.

i-think.
therefore I sort of am.

i-think.JPG

More to follow on this amazing technology and I hope to have a complete product review as soon as possible, so stay tuned.

Urgent Update: I’ve just been informed that Sackville Industries was bought today by the Dollar Store for $2.00 and 55 fluffy pillows. Here is the new company brand:

brand.jpg

A new model for society

Jon Husband refers to Constellation W, a website in English & French that covers some interesting territory around the forces influencing our development as a society in the 21st century. Jon notes that, “This next era will create a society of knowledge; its principal tool will be the Internet 2 while its principal handicap will be too-large amounts of information that is not in context.”

Too large amounts of information is what the whole notion of PKM is about. I’ve noticed a real interest in personal knowledge management whenever we discuss it during the informal learning workshops. People are overwhelmed with information.

The Constellation W site is a wealth of information with great diagrams, though I still find navigation a bit confusing, and it’s too bad that you can’t make comments on each page. Perhaps this will change over time. Take a look at the principal diagram, showing the three waves of technology, economy and society. Here is the summary of the conclusions on the Knowledge-based Society:

  • The challenge is not any longer to install the Internet everywhere or to modify the economy, but more fundamentally to change our society in all its aspects. What are the human sacrifices that the knowledge society risks reclaiming ?
  • Because of the ubiquity of the Internet, millions of individual decisions may become collective actions. How do we tame or shape this extraordinary power of the collective which is beginning to make itself felt ?
  • It will be the young people who will inherit this new society. What will be the values which will influence their decisions, thus their choices about the societies of the future ?

Lots of food for thought and many more conversations. Thanks to Jon and the rest of the team for the great work.

The means of production

Social media on the web (blogs, wikis, podcasts, videos) have given the 1 billion connected people on the planet the basic tools of production in a knowledge economy. We can create mental abstractions that represent our knowledge and then share them with the world for validation. For the first time in history, the workers own the means of production of the valuable assets of the current economy – intangible goods. We know that intangibles are valuable because that’s what our stock markets tell us. For example, the S&P index is over 85% intangibles.

This ability to be the means of production makes informal learning on the web very powerful. We have always learned informally; in corridors between classes or when interacting on the job. Now we can have many more of these interactions and we can find people who are as passionate about an issue as we are. Informal learning in our networked society is not something that you inject into formal training nor is it something you add to your favourite mix of “blended learning”. Informal learning is a paradigm-shifting phenonomen that has arrived because we are now connected, we have cheap technologies and we need to increase our knowledge due to the complex challenges we face in our economies and societies.

As we become more connected, I think that informal learning may become the only way that we will learn in the future. We will need individual, customised experiences and we will decide what these will be. Formal, standardized training & education will become second class. Standardized jobs will be the lowest paying ones, so who will want standardized education? Not anyone who has a choice. The choices will be various and many will be free. They already are.

How can organisations take advantage of this? Create a compelling reason for workers to want to advance the purpose of your enterprise and then give them the means (unfettered access to tools and other people) to learn on their own. If your organisation deserves it, then your workers will figure out what’s best for them, their organisation and our society. Sound radical? It is.

masssocialmedia.jpg
Diagram by Dion Hinchcliffe

Update: and then I come across Chris Sessums’ blog post on Read, Write, Mix Burn … where he refers to a paper written by Robbie McClintock seven years ago:

“In a world in which each individual can pursue most any personal purpose in most any place that suits him, all on his own initiative, the habit of relying on authoritative institutions, which operate through commands enforced by penalties and inducements, may sharply diminish. With the change of phase in the opportunity factor, people need less and less to rely on formal institutions for a chance to fulfill their personal purposes. And as more and more people become aware of the unlimited choices that they have in their personal lives, sanctions and incentives will become ineffectual means of administering authoritative commands in government, society, business, and education.” (para 101)

Informal Learning at TechKnowledge 2007

I really enjoyed presenting at TK2007 this week, even though our session was moved to a new venue and it was at the end of the day. Being that the topic was informal learning, the session was – informal. The next day I reviewed the participant evaluations with Jay, who has already noted several of the comments. Needless to say, there was a wide spectrum of opinions. Perhaps the best comment was, “They didn’t have the presentation down – too informal for me. I like the irony.

I too, liked the irony. Perhaps it’s the difference between entertaining and facilitating learning. Sometimes you need to have your cognitive tree shaken a bit. I also noticed that those who have been following the blog conversations were ready to jump in and add some more.

stream.jpg

With the opening-up of the informal learning unworkshops, I hope that more people jump in to this flowing conversation. Informal learning is obviously not new, but the Web has opened up some fascinating new ways of conversing, collaborating and creating meaning.

I will not buy MS Vista

Michael Geist explains in plain English why there is no reason to rent (you’re not purchasing it anyway) Microsoft Vista:

Even after installation, the legal agreement grants Microsoft the right to revalidate the software or to require users to reactivate it should they make changes to their computer components. In addition, it sets significant limits on the ability to copy or transfer the software, prohibiting anything more than a single backup copy and setting strict limits on transferring the software to different devices or users.

Vista also incorporates Windows Defender, an anti-virus program that actively scans computers for “spyware, adware, and other potentially unwanted software.” The agreement does not define any of these terms, leaving it to Microsoft to determine what constitutes unwanted software. Once operational, the agreement warns that Windows Defender will, by default, automatically remove software rated “high” or “severe,”even though that may result in other software ceasing to work or mistakenly result in the removal of software that is not unwanted.

Given that most applications are available on the web (e.g. GoogleDocuments, Gliffy, Gmail …) and that Apple or Linux give you an excellent desktop, is there any reason to support this monopoly? Not for me.

Informal in Vegas

paris-vegas.JPG

It’s been a hectic week, with a full-day session in Ottawa followed by a long flight to Las Vegas, and then three days of TechKnowledge 2007. It’s been a time to connect and re-connect with many people and have several long conversations. I guesss that this trip has reinforced my understanding that learning is conversation. It’s how you make meaning, by having conversations in the trusted space that you’ve been lucky enough to create.

I didn’t get to many of the sessions but I’m glad that I was able to attend Tony Karrer’s presentation on blogs and social tagging. Each time you see someone else explaining a concept to others, you understand a bit more how to communicate it yourself. Tony did a great job working with an audience that had wide-ranging levels of skills and knowledge.

There hasn’t been much time for reflection on all that’s transpired but that can wait for the red-eye flight back to Canada tonight. There will also be some announcements concerning the unworkshops next week, so stay tuned.

Of course, there has been a been some time for little bit of sightseeing …

jay-and-elvis.JPG

but I didn’t get a chance to take in any of the shows:

menopause.JPG

Informal Learning Workshop Follow-up

Some links and references that I promised during yesterday’s workshop in Ottawa are here.

The discussion on networked learning, with Leigh Blackall

Kathy Sierra, Creating Passionate Users

Presentation Zen Blog

Judy Brown’s Web 2.0 Tools

Robert Paterson’s interview about blogging with PBS. Follow the link that Rob provides and look on the right box called Extended Interviews.

The Five Minute University video

Lawrence Lessig, On free and the differences between culture & code, Google Video

Just add a note in the comments if I missed something. Some other links will be sent to everyone via e-mail.

I’d like to thank everyone who came out and helped to make a great day of meaningful conversations.