Harold Jarche

Facebook selling your information?

by

Last week, I said that I thought that there should be an open source alternative to Facebook (and there is at least one) . A few days later I came across this video overview of the money and politics behind Facebook, though I wasn’t sure of its veracity. Today, I saw this note from Lorne Novolker on Facebook:

Apparently Facebook has started SELLING user information (surprise, surprise!) to third parties. They call it the “Facebook Development Platform.”

To restrict use of your information, do the following:
Click “Privacy” on top right.
Under the “Facebook Platform” section click”Edit Settings”.
Scroll down to the bottom and UNCHECK ALL of the items under facebook platform.

Most creepy is the inclusion of photographs!
(Do your friends a favor and repost this as your own note.)

Unless a platform is truly open source, it seems that when we participate, someone else always profits.

“The life, and death, of Canadian Startups”

by

Got a startup or know of one in Canada? Tell the folks at StartupNorth:

StartupNorth is a project to review Canadian startups and to build a community of users who are passionate about building great companies in Canada.

The community is still in its infancy, but it looks like it could become  a great place for interesting business conversations.  There are only a few companies listed so far, including a previous client of mine, YourTeamOnline.

Old-School Rules

by

Tom Haskins adds to the many comments on Will Richardson’s post about technology being the devil, and then shows the real rules that students learn from an industrial-age “teach-to-the-test” approach:

It’s as-if the teacher is saying:

  1. This is a bogus challenge that’s designed to diminish your curiosity and creativity. Please don’t think about the pseudo-value of this challenge to you. Don’t approach the useless exercise or flawed course design as the actual problem to solve. Don’t see through this scam or find solutions among yourselves that I’ll be clueless to comprehend.
  2. I‘m pretending the web does not exist. I’m assuming you do not have successes every day where you easily find what you’re looking for online. I expect you to experience information as a scarce resource that’s difficult to find and disconnected from other sources. You are required to play along with me.
  3. This is a stupid game to play that deserves your contempt. I’m cheating you out of an authentic learning experience so please return the favor and cheat your way out of this stupid game.
  4. I’m a pathetic game designer. I have no idea how to add a narrative dimension to the challenges. I can only be blatantly obvious and boring. It’s left to you to show me how to be devious, ingenious and clever in hopes I might learn what you know.

There is no shortage of information in our networked world. We don’t need to teach “stuff” because our children live in a world of information abundance. A teaching and content-centric approach is outdated and useless. Education today needs a learning and process-centric approach. As Albert Einstein said, “Imagination is more important than knowledge.”

The rules of the game need to change.

An alternative to corporatism

by

A while back I said that I believe that the great work to be done at the beginning of this century is to create new organisational models that reflect our humanity. Our current business models don’t serve the people, only a very small group at the top. Corporatism is only helping the rich get richer:

“In 1980, the average corporate CEO earned 42 times as much as the average worker. In 1998, the average corporate CEO earned 419 times as much as the average worker. Today, the average Fortune 500 CEO earns 443 times as much as Hourly workers in their companies.”

The corporation as an entity has outlived its usefulness for humanity, and it’s time to find an alternative. This overview from a study guide for the documentary The Corporation, clearly shows the symptoms of a dysfunctional system:

“If the corporation can be viewed legally as ‘a person’ then why not socially? Actual internationally recognized diagnostic criteria are used to judge the behaviour of corporations and the picture that emerges is one of the corporation as self-interested, inherently amoral, callous and deceitful; it breaches social and legal standards to get its way; it does not suffer from guilt, yet it can mimic the human qualities of empathy, caring and altruism. Four case studies, drawn from a universe of corporate activity, are used to demonstrate harm to workers, human health, animals and the biosphere.”

It’s time to test out alternatives to corporate governance models in the private and public and social sectors. Dave Pollard has written an excellent article on how we can use the natural enterprise model to create sustainable ways of wealth generation, because our current models sure aren’t working:

“The whole capitalist system is a miserable failure, and it’s only the corporatists’ control of the media (and hence their ability to brainwash us into believing the system actually works), that has kept us from rising up and dismantling it.

Well, actually that’s not the only thing keeping us from overthrowing it: We don’t know what to replace it with. Socialist systems don’t seem to work. Totalitarian fascist systems certainly don’t work. So now we’re indoctrinated into believing that there are no other systems, and that we’re stuck with the capitalist (or more accurately, corporatist) system that is destroying our world (and eliminating the middle class in the process).” – Dave Pollard

Dave proposes three types of public organisations – Directorates, Auditors, and Agencies. Each with its responsibilities, limitations and controls.  This reminds me of the US model of legislative, executive, and judiciary authority or the Canadian version of Crown, Commons, and Senate. Recent events in both countries show that we need to create new models, as the old ones get corrupted over time.

One place to start is at the local level, where we can have greater influence and perhaps see faster development of new models. This includes getting involved in local riding policy-making, testing organisations like a work commons or co-work space, and ensuring that local politicians understand the underlying systemic issues plaguing our society. As Dave says, “We have to do better. The old models don’t work, any of them. It’s time to try something new.“

Are we fostering bi-illiterates?

by

I’ve been watching the New Brunswick bilingual education system for a decade now. It’s presided by a Minister who heads two separate departments, based on language. Within the English sector many schools offer early, middle and late French immersion. There is also a movement in our district to offer a hybrid between early and middle immersion. Few seem happy with the system and there are constant attempts to tinker with it.

My own observations, as a parent and a consultant to the Department, are that design and implementation don’t seem to mesh very well. The idea of French immersion is to start with a lot of spoken and written French in the early years and then taper off in high school. The concept is fine, but the implemention requires teachers with excellent French language skills, as the students only have one person to emulate. Our experience shows major discrepancies in French ability amongst teachers, to the extent that in some cases we have had to correct the teacher’s assignments.

At the NextNB public forum [what ever happened to those recommendations from 2004?] I remember a French language professor stating that he preferred students who had not been in French immersion in high school, as they had fewer bad habits. He said that non-immersion students passed the immersion graduates by the middle of the first year of university.

I have often wondered if we are developing bi-illiterate graduates in our public school system; fluent in neither English nor French. I was reminded of this in reading Alec Bruce’s article, Trudeaumania. Alec says that Justin Trudeau slayed a few sacred cows on his recent visit to New Brunswick, including this attribution:

“New Brunswick’s bifurcated public school system produces functionally illiterate Francophones and Anglophones more efficiently than it graduates culturally tolerant, linguistically engaged citizens.”

Perhaps we are seeing the beginning of a movement to make the radical changes that we need in our education system. It seems that this conversation is becoming more public.

… in spite of news to the contrary, I still believe that it’s good to have a serious discussion about our education system.

Early Years Study Presentation with Fraser Mustard

by

Received this invitation by e-mail and was asked to pass it on:

The attached invitation is in regards to an upcoming seminar with Fraser Mustard and the Hon. Margaret Norrie McCain at Brunton Auditorium, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB on May 15, 2007 from 1:00 PM to 4:00 PM.

Fraser Mustard will be presenting an overview of the recently released Early Years Study 2: Putting Science into Action.  There will be a question and answer session with Fraser Mustard and Margaret McCain following the presentation. (He is also receiving an honorary degree at the MtA convocation)

Early Years Study 2 reports on how the children in our country are doing and what can be done to apply the lessons of the study.  The evidence is clear.  The needs are clear.  We can take action now that will make a difference.  If we act as a community, we can improve the outcomes for all children and their families.

Read more about him, and his work as a champion for communities supporting Early Childhood Development.

If you are able to attend  please RSVP to the Council for Early Child Development, tel: 416-849-1332 or email cecd_general@councilecd.ca

Citizen Participation

by

I fnally created a Facebook account, especially since it’s now banned for Ontario government employees. Only takes a ban to get me motivated ;-)

I also see that Cynthia is using Facebook to connect with voters during the PEI election, so maybe this is more than just a flash in the pan, given the +15 million members.

All of this citizen participation that is breaking out made me think about a poster created by demonstrating French students in 1968. Is someone else profiting from all of these social networks, or is it truly a citizen-led phenomenon?

je-participe.gif

Emergent complexity from social networks

by

If I was an employee, I’d want to have someone like Ross Mayfield as my boss. He really understands the way that work is changing. I came across this good (but too short) ZD Net interview on Web 2.0 for the enterprise via Jay Cross.

In a panel interview, Ross Mayfield starts by saying that collaborative work tools must be simple to be effective. The real complexity comes out of the emergent social network, not in the software on which it’s based. Over-engineering for complex social (work) environments seems to be counterproductive. Ross also says that automating processes won’t give you any sustainable competitive advantages either, because others will be able to replicate these processes just as well. Where social tools, like wikis, have an impact is in changing the corporate culture. In a more transparent and collaborative work environment, powered by collaborative web-based tools, information hoarding is punished and sharing is rewarded. The workplace changes.

The most memorable line is when Ross shows the disconnect between the new world of work and the old world of education; “These are the people who did their homework on MySpace, and it was called cheating, and then they come to the enterprise and it’s called collaboration”.

The times they are a changin’

Here are Ross Mayfield’s own words, following up from the ZD Net “sound bite”:

Blogs and Wikis are inherently more transparent than email, where 90% of collaboration occurs.  Users are first gaining exposure to these tools as consumers, within consumer culture.  The default in that culture with these tools is transparency and sharing.  Corporate cultures vary. I can say that we see earlier adoption by corporations with healthy cultures and management practices such as 360 degree reviews, and adoption practices matter.  But it should be noted that consumer culture spills over to corporate culture.  And because this culture shift aids practice building, I’d assert that these tools will trend us towards transparency.

Intro to Blogs in Education

by

I’ve been asked to conduct an in-service workshop for our local high school. The original request was for blogs, wikis and everything else Web 2.0 but I’ve managed to limit it to just blogs for starters. Participation is voluntary, so I’m assuming a motivated group of teachers.

I know that I could spend a day or two on the subject, but my challenge will be to motivate and hopefully instruct a bit within the one hour available. I’m asking for help from anyone who has done this before.

I’m considering starting with a short video to get attention. Something like The Machine is Us/ing Us, but I’d like any other recommendations. This could be followed by a discussion of the concerns that teachers may have about using blogs for their classes. Finally, I’ll show how to create a blog and set it up for class use. My first impulse is to use Eduspaces, even though it is more complicated to set up than WordPress.com or Blogger. The social networking aspects of Eduspaces resemble Facebook and the students might prefer this, even if the teachers may need more help with it.

I’ll also create a short list of web resources as a take-away. This list would include Will Richardson, Teachers Teaching Teachers, and Start Blogging. Any other excellent resources for beginners out there?

Training, for all that ails you

by

“Canadian companies aren’t spending enough on training,” said the announcer on the radio this morning. My first thought was that we would never hear the news that we weren’t spending enough on bandages in our healthcare system. Once again, the mass media and the so-called experts get it wrong. It makes you wonder if there’s a training industry lobby out there.

According to the Conference Board of Canada:

“Canadian organizations are under increasing pressure, due to a tight labour market and competitive demands, to renew and upgrade workers’ skills. Building workers skills through training, learning and development is one way for organizations to compete. Yet, TLD spending in Canada is stagnant,” said Michael Bloom, Vice-President, Organizational Effectiveness and Learning.

Read in its entirety, this makes sense, as TLD is only one way to improve performance. There are many other ways and usually training is the most expensive method. I’ve noticed that many large organisations have a tendency to slap on the training bandaid once any problem has been labelled a human performance issue. It seems that the media and research institutes reinforce this behaviour. However, training that is not directly related to developing specific skills and knowledge wastes time, bores workers and costs money.

This is not the first, nor the second, but the third time that I have heard our national broadcaster report the unfounded notion that training can solve unrelated performance problems. This is the same as prescribing medication without a diagnosis. Of course I don’t really blame the CBC, because it is getting this misinformation from our training and learning “experts”. The snake oil salesmen have jumped on the Conference Board report and are demanding that companies spend more on training. That would be a costly mistake.

I also noticed from the Conference Board’s report that informal learning is actually being mentioned:

Informal learning, which is not well tracked or monitored, may be occurring more frequently. Respondents said 42 per cent of all learning occurs informally.

I get the sinking feeling that informal learning will soon be commoditized by the TLD industry and sold like training currently is – as a solution looking for a problem.

To read the complete report you would have to spend $975 to find out what many of us already know. Training is a means (one of several, not limited to learning & development), while performance is the real goal.